New Jersey Town's Government Overreach Against Church's Shelter
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 11 hours ago
**Government Overreach: New Jersey Town Targets Church's Homeless Shelter Plan**
In a shocking move that raises concerns about government overreach and the protection of religious freedoms, a church in Toms River, New Jersey, is facing the threat of eminent domain as it seeks to provide much-needed assistance to the homeless community.
Christ Episcopal Church, which owns a substantial 10 acres of land, proposed a modest 17-bed overnight shelter to help those in need. Instead of receiving support, the church has witnessed local officials retaliate with plans to confiscate the property and convert it into recreational facilities, specifically pickleball courts.
The church's attorney, Harvey York, argued that the action is not only a violation of the church's rights but also a clear example of the government overstepping its authority. “It is apparent that this is being done in retaliation for the church's application for a homeless shelter,” York stated, pointing to the constitutional protections that are meant to safeguard freedom of religion.
While some residents express satisfaction with the town's proposal for recreational space, the overwhelming majority have voiced their disapproval. Many are baffled by the decision to target a church that is simply trying to answer the call of compassion and service to their community.
York emphasized the bizarre nature of the town's rationale, arguing that it contradicts the community's needs and priorities. “For them to say they need recreational land flies in the face of the facts,” he remarked, referencing a master plan that seemingly disregards the necessity of social support.
The legal battle is expected to escalate, with constitutional law experts suggesting the potential for the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. This case could echo the infamous Kelo v. City of New London ruling, which allowed governments to seize private property under the guise of public benefit—a decision that ultimately undermined the principles of property rights and personal freedoms.
In a climate of ongoing debates surrounding property rights and the role of government, the actions of Toms River officials raise a crucial question: How far is too far when it comes to government intervention in the lives of citizens and their right to practice their faith?
As this case unfolds, it will be vital for citizens and communities across the nation to remain vigilant against government overreach and to advocate for their rights to freely live out their faith and assist those in need without interference.
Sources:
economiccollapse.report
cowboystatedaily.com
wndnewscenter.org
In a shocking move that raises concerns about government overreach and the protection of religious freedoms, a church in Toms River, New Jersey, is facing the threat of eminent domain as it seeks to provide much-needed assistance to the homeless community.
Christ Episcopal Church, which owns a substantial 10 acres of land, proposed a modest 17-bed overnight shelter to help those in need. Instead of receiving support, the church has witnessed local officials retaliate with plans to confiscate the property and convert it into recreational facilities, specifically pickleball courts.
The church's attorney, Harvey York, argued that the action is not only a violation of the church's rights but also a clear example of the government overstepping its authority. “It is apparent that this is being done in retaliation for the church's application for a homeless shelter,” York stated, pointing to the constitutional protections that are meant to safeguard freedom of religion.
While some residents express satisfaction with the town's proposal for recreational space, the overwhelming majority have voiced their disapproval. Many are baffled by the decision to target a church that is simply trying to answer the call of compassion and service to their community.
York emphasized the bizarre nature of the town's rationale, arguing that it contradicts the community's needs and priorities. “For them to say they need recreational land flies in the face of the facts,” he remarked, referencing a master plan that seemingly disregards the necessity of social support.
The legal battle is expected to escalate, with constitutional law experts suggesting the potential for the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. This case could echo the infamous Kelo v. City of New London ruling, which allowed governments to seize private property under the guise of public benefit—a decision that ultimately undermined the principles of property rights and personal freedoms.
In a climate of ongoing debates surrounding property rights and the role of government, the actions of Toms River officials raise a crucial question: How far is too far when it comes to government intervention in the lives of citizens and their right to practice their faith?
As this case unfolds, it will be vital for citizens and communities across the nation to remain vigilant against government overreach and to advocate for their rights to freely live out their faith and assist those in need without interference.
Sources:
economiccollapse.report
cowboystatedaily.com
wndnewscenter.org
Latest News