EPA Appeals Fluoride Ruling, Puts Children's Health at Risk
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing to appeal a landmark ruling regarding water fluoridation, potentially putting children’s health at risk in the process.
In a recent development, the Trump Administration's Department of Justice (DOJ), under the direction of Solicitor General Pam Bondi, confirmed plans to challenge a federal court ruling which mandated the EPA to reassess the hazards posed by fluoride in drinking water.
This decision follows a February ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen, whose court found that the current levels of water fluoridation expose children to "unreasonable risk." Chen cited extensive scientific evidence suggesting that even the optimal fluoride levels linked to developmental risks, including reduced IQ and adverse health impacts on pregnant women and young children.
Despite the judge's clear recommendation for regulatory action, the EPA has opted to appeal rather than heed this warning. Michael Connett, an attorney representing the plaintiffs in this case, expressed disappointment, arguing that the EPA is missing a critical opportunity to prioritize health over industry interests.
Fluoride, a common additive in American water supplies, has garnered significant controversy, particularly in light of research indicating potential risks. As communities across the nation voice concerns, more than 60 U.S. towns and counties, along with states such as Utah and Florida, have already taken action to halt the practice.
The pushback against fluoride is gaining momentum, as the ruling has revived discussions about the integrity of environmental policies and the agency's stance on public health. Critics of the EPA’s decision are voicing their frustration over what they see as the prioritization of corporate interests over the well-being of children.
As scientific studies continue to reveal concerning associations between fluoride and health risks, the public is left questioning why the government is challenging a ruling that could ultimately protect the health of millions of American families.
The forthcoming appeal will reach the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, where the implications of this case could reshape environmental health standards and underscore the ongoing dialogue about the safety of additives in our water supply.
Time will tell if the EPA will acknowledge the growing body of evidence and respond adequately to the concerns surrounding fluoride use. For now, the health and safety of American children hang in the balance.
Sources:
childrenshealthdefense.org
theepochtimes.com
slaynews.com
In a recent development, the Trump Administration's Department of Justice (DOJ), under the direction of Solicitor General Pam Bondi, confirmed plans to challenge a federal court ruling which mandated the EPA to reassess the hazards posed by fluoride in drinking water.
This decision follows a February ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen, whose court found that the current levels of water fluoridation expose children to "unreasonable risk." Chen cited extensive scientific evidence suggesting that even the optimal fluoride levels linked to developmental risks, including reduced IQ and adverse health impacts on pregnant women and young children.
Despite the judge's clear recommendation for regulatory action, the EPA has opted to appeal rather than heed this warning. Michael Connett, an attorney representing the plaintiffs in this case, expressed disappointment, arguing that the EPA is missing a critical opportunity to prioritize health over industry interests.
Fluoride, a common additive in American water supplies, has garnered significant controversy, particularly in light of research indicating potential risks. As communities across the nation voice concerns, more than 60 U.S. towns and counties, along with states such as Utah and Florida, have already taken action to halt the practice.
The pushback against fluoride is gaining momentum, as the ruling has revived discussions about the integrity of environmental policies and the agency's stance on public health. Critics of the EPA’s decision are voicing their frustration over what they see as the prioritization of corporate interests over the well-being of children.
As scientific studies continue to reveal concerning associations between fluoride and health risks, the public is left questioning why the government is challenging a ruling that could ultimately protect the health of millions of American families.
The forthcoming appeal will reach the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, where the implications of this case could reshape environmental health standards and underscore the ongoing dialogue about the safety of additives in our water supply.
Time will tell if the EPA will acknowledge the growing body of evidence and respond adequately to the concerns surrounding fluoride use. For now, the health and safety of American children hang in the balance.
Sources:
childrenshealthdefense.org
theepochtimes.com
slaynews.com
Latest News