Democratic Tribe Profits from Taxpayer Funds: Hypocrisy Exposed
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 10 hours ago
**Hypocrisy on Full Display: Democratic-Backed Tribe Rakes in Taxpayer Dollars While Attacking Trump**
In an eyebrow-raising revelation, a California Native American tribe, known for its vocal support of Democratic candidates, has been abusing taxpayer funds to the tune of millions—all while profiting handsomely from its casino operations.
The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians has pocketed an astounding $28 million in federal grant funding since 1996, according to a recent report from the American Accountability Foundation, highlighted by The Daily Wire. This massive windfall comes despite the tribe operating one of the largest and most profitable casinos in the country, which generates nearly half a billion dollars in annual revenue.
American Accountability Foundation President Tom Jones expressed outrage over this glaring inconsistency. "Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to bankroll the Pechanga tribe’s lavish lifestyles and radical views, especially when individual tribe members are raking in tens of thousands a month from casino profits," he stated.
The bulk of these federal grants, approximately $27 million, has flowed in since 2008, conveniently coinciding with a decline in the tribe's supposed need. Many leaders of the Pechanga tribe, including Chief Mark Macarro, reside in million-dollar homes and have openly campaigned against President Donald Trump, even contributing significant sums to Democratic candidates like Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.
Macarro’s cozy relationship with the Democratic establishment raises further questions about the appropriateness of continued taxpayer funding. He has not only opposed Trump but has also been spotted aboard Air Force One with President Biden, discussing issues like clemency for convicted radical activists.
The tribe's financial interests seem to be in stark contrast with their public rhetoric. Claims of poverty and need fall flat when juxtaposed with their extravagant lifestyle and wealth derived from their casino. Ex-member anecdotes reveal that tribe members reportedly receive over $20,000 monthly from casino profits.
As part of their federal funding, the tribe has also received substantial grants from various government departments, including nearly $13.4 million for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. These figures reveal a troubling pattern: while the Pechanga tribe profits from a successful gaming enterprise, they simultaneously engage in political advocacy against those who seek fiscal responsibility.
The American Accountability Foundation is calling for a reevaluation of these funds, arguing that tribes benefiting from lucrative operations should not be allowed to exploit taxpayer support for partisan agendas.
In the face of this growing scandal, it’s crucial for responsible governance to prioritize the interests of taxpayers over those benefiting from political favoritism disguised as social justice. This case serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and contradictions at the intersection of tribal funding and political loyalties. The time has come to put an end to such hypocrisy and ensure our public funds are used judiciously, not to sustain extravagant lifestyles of those with political agendas.
Sources:
dailywire.com
townhall.com
abcnews.go.com
In an eyebrow-raising revelation, a California Native American tribe, known for its vocal support of Democratic candidates, has been abusing taxpayer funds to the tune of millions—all while profiting handsomely from its casino operations.
The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians has pocketed an astounding $28 million in federal grant funding since 1996, according to a recent report from the American Accountability Foundation, highlighted by The Daily Wire. This massive windfall comes despite the tribe operating one of the largest and most profitable casinos in the country, which generates nearly half a billion dollars in annual revenue.
American Accountability Foundation President Tom Jones expressed outrage over this glaring inconsistency. "Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to bankroll the Pechanga tribe’s lavish lifestyles and radical views, especially when individual tribe members are raking in tens of thousands a month from casino profits," he stated.
The bulk of these federal grants, approximately $27 million, has flowed in since 2008, conveniently coinciding with a decline in the tribe's supposed need. Many leaders of the Pechanga tribe, including Chief Mark Macarro, reside in million-dollar homes and have openly campaigned against President Donald Trump, even contributing significant sums to Democratic candidates like Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.
Macarro’s cozy relationship with the Democratic establishment raises further questions about the appropriateness of continued taxpayer funding. He has not only opposed Trump but has also been spotted aboard Air Force One with President Biden, discussing issues like clemency for convicted radical activists.
The tribe's financial interests seem to be in stark contrast with their public rhetoric. Claims of poverty and need fall flat when juxtaposed with their extravagant lifestyle and wealth derived from their casino. Ex-member anecdotes reveal that tribe members reportedly receive over $20,000 monthly from casino profits.
As part of their federal funding, the tribe has also received substantial grants from various government departments, including nearly $13.4 million for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. These figures reveal a troubling pattern: while the Pechanga tribe profits from a successful gaming enterprise, they simultaneously engage in political advocacy against those who seek fiscal responsibility.
The American Accountability Foundation is calling for a reevaluation of these funds, arguing that tribes benefiting from lucrative operations should not be allowed to exploit taxpayer support for partisan agendas.
In the face of this growing scandal, it’s crucial for responsible governance to prioritize the interests of taxpayers over those benefiting from political favoritism disguised as social justice. This case serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and contradictions at the intersection of tribal funding and political loyalties. The time has come to put an end to such hypocrisy and ensure our public funds are used judiciously, not to sustain extravagant lifestyles of those with political agendas.
Sources:
dailywire.com
townhall.com
abcnews.go.com
Latest News