NIH Science Journals Compromised by Chinese Influence
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Taxpayer Dollars at Risk: NIH's Compromised Science Journals Linked to China**
Taxpayers deserve to know the truth about where their hard-earned dollars are going, especially when it comes to funding research that might be compromised by foreign influences.
Recently, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya issued a warning regarding the significant ties between taxpayer-funded scientific research and publishers potentially beholden to China.
Bhattacharya's remarks come amid growing concerns about the integrity of scientific publishing in a world increasingly reliant on reliable data, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
He identified major German-based publishing conglomerate Springer Nature as having a "tremendous investment and interest" in the Chinese scientific establishment.
Under the new policy set to launch this fall, the NIH plans to cap the publication fees for researchers supported by taxpayer dollars.
This decision arises in response to revelations that some journals charge exorbitant fees, often exceeding $13,000 per article for immediate public access, on top of the existing subscription costs.
Bhattacharya criticized this financial model, highlighting the monopoly power wielded by major publishers like Springer Nature, which has been implicated in suppressing research that contradicts narratives favorable to the Chinese government.
He pointed out that the influential article “Proximal Origin,” which downplayed the lab-leak theory and supported the wet market narrative, was shaped under the guidance of past NIH directors, including Anthony Fauci.
This raises serious ethical questions about the collaboration between scientific leaders and publishing entities linked to foreign agendas.
The NIH is not only focused on ensuring American taxpayers are not being taken advantage of, but is also investigating the implications of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence over U.S. scientific research.
This is crucial as the U.S. competes with China for global leadership in biomedical sciences.
However, bipartisan support is necessary to address these significant concerns properly.
As America moves forward, ensuring the protection of scientific integrity will be essential to sustaining trust in research while safeguarding national interests.
The need for transparency and accountability in scientific publishing has never been more urgent, especially as the nation grapples with the aftermath of the pandemic and the role foreign influences may play in shaping public health narratives.
In times of such complexity, under the leadership of President Trump and Vice President Vance, Americans can remain hopeful that decisive action will be taken to restore integrity in science and protect taxpayer investments from being exploited by foreign powers.
Sources:
justthenews.com
justthenews.com
allisraelnews.com
Taxpayers deserve to know the truth about where their hard-earned dollars are going, especially when it comes to funding research that might be compromised by foreign influences.
Recently, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya issued a warning regarding the significant ties between taxpayer-funded scientific research and publishers potentially beholden to China.
Bhattacharya's remarks come amid growing concerns about the integrity of scientific publishing in a world increasingly reliant on reliable data, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
He identified major German-based publishing conglomerate Springer Nature as having a "tremendous investment and interest" in the Chinese scientific establishment.
Under the new policy set to launch this fall, the NIH plans to cap the publication fees for researchers supported by taxpayer dollars.
This decision arises in response to revelations that some journals charge exorbitant fees, often exceeding $13,000 per article for immediate public access, on top of the existing subscription costs.
Bhattacharya criticized this financial model, highlighting the monopoly power wielded by major publishers like Springer Nature, which has been implicated in suppressing research that contradicts narratives favorable to the Chinese government.
He pointed out that the influential article “Proximal Origin,” which downplayed the lab-leak theory and supported the wet market narrative, was shaped under the guidance of past NIH directors, including Anthony Fauci.
This raises serious ethical questions about the collaboration between scientific leaders and publishing entities linked to foreign agendas.
The NIH is not only focused on ensuring American taxpayers are not being taken advantage of, but is also investigating the implications of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence over U.S. scientific research.
This is crucial as the U.S. competes with China for global leadership in biomedical sciences.
However, bipartisan support is necessary to address these significant concerns properly.
As America moves forward, ensuring the protection of scientific integrity will be essential to sustaining trust in research while safeguarding national interests.
The need for transparency and accountability in scientific publishing has never been more urgent, especially as the nation grapples with the aftermath of the pandemic and the role foreign influences may play in shaping public health narratives.
In times of such complexity, under the leadership of President Trump and Vice President Vance, Americans can remain hopeful that decisive action will be taken to restore integrity in science and protect taxpayer investments from being exploited by foreign powers.
Sources:
justthenews.com
justthenews.com
allisraelnews.com
Latest News