Wisconsin Court's Ruling: A Disturbing Judicial Power Grab
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 10 hours ago
Judicial Overreach
In a brazen display of judicial activism, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has overturned a hard-fought abortion law, disregarding the rule of law in favor of personal preference.
This decision is a stark reminder of the continuous struggle to uphold constitutional principles against the tide of progressive sentiment.
The court's majority declared that a longstanding law dating back to 1849 — which explicitly made abortion a felony — had been effectively repealed, despite the absence of any legislative action to warrant such a conclusion.
Justice Annette Ziegler, representing the minority dissenting opinion, criticized her colleagues for what she termed a "jaw-dropping exercise of judicial will."
In her statement, she emphasized that it is the court's duty to adhere to established law, even when personal beliefs may dictate otherwise.
The majority's ruling has been labeled a "power grab" by pro-life advocates, who argue that it nullifies a law deliberately preserved by elected representatives for over 175 years.
This alarming trend of judicial overreach is not an isolated incident.
The original Roe v. Wade decision, which established a so-called "right" to abortion, was similarly devoid of constitutional grounding and has faced growing scrutiny since its recent overturning.
Now, following the Wisconsin Supreme Court's latest ruling, the lives of unborn children are once again at risk.
Pro-life advocates, including Andrew Bath from the Thomas More Society, have expressed their outrage, stating that this decision mocks the very concepts of judicial restraint and the separation of powers enshrined in our Constitution.
With this radical shift in the law, many are left wondering how far the judicial system will go in undermining democratic processes.
As the nation continues to grapple with the implications of such decisions, it is crucial to remember the fundamental role of the judiciary: to interpret, not to legislate from the bench.
The events in Wisconsin underline the urgent need for a return to constitutional adherence and a reaffirmation of the rights of the most vulnerable among us.
Sources:
blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
outkick.com
wnd.com
In a brazen display of judicial activism, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has overturned a hard-fought abortion law, disregarding the rule of law in favor of personal preference.
This decision is a stark reminder of the continuous struggle to uphold constitutional principles against the tide of progressive sentiment.
The court's majority declared that a longstanding law dating back to 1849 — which explicitly made abortion a felony — had been effectively repealed, despite the absence of any legislative action to warrant such a conclusion.
Justice Annette Ziegler, representing the minority dissenting opinion, criticized her colleagues for what she termed a "jaw-dropping exercise of judicial will."
In her statement, she emphasized that it is the court's duty to adhere to established law, even when personal beliefs may dictate otherwise.
The majority's ruling has been labeled a "power grab" by pro-life advocates, who argue that it nullifies a law deliberately preserved by elected representatives for over 175 years.
This alarming trend of judicial overreach is not an isolated incident.
The original Roe v. Wade decision, which established a so-called "right" to abortion, was similarly devoid of constitutional grounding and has faced growing scrutiny since its recent overturning.
Now, following the Wisconsin Supreme Court's latest ruling, the lives of unborn children are once again at risk.
Pro-life advocates, including Andrew Bath from the Thomas More Society, have expressed their outrage, stating that this decision mocks the very concepts of judicial restraint and the separation of powers enshrined in our Constitution.
With this radical shift in the law, many are left wondering how far the judicial system will go in undermining democratic processes.
As the nation continues to grapple with the implications of such decisions, it is crucial to remember the fundamental role of the judiciary: to interpret, not to legislate from the bench.
The events in Wisconsin underline the urgent need for a return to constitutional adherence and a reaffirmation of the rights of the most vulnerable among us.
Sources:
blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
outkick.com
wnd.com
Latest News