Jury Verdict Highlights Systemic Failures in Healthcare
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 5 hours ago
**Justice Denied: Jury Sides with Hospital in Controversial COVID Case**
In a disheartening verdict that raises serious questions about patient rights and hospital protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic, a jury in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, recently sided with Ascension Hospital in a wrongful death lawsuit connected to the tragic case of Grace Schara.
Grace, a 19-year-old with Down Syndrome, passed away on October 13, 2021, just a week after being admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 symptoms. Her father, Scott Schara, argued that his daughter's death resulted from medical negligence, alleging that the hospital administered intravenous drugs without the family's informed consent.
The jury, after only two hours of deliberation, dismissed many of the family's claims, including the critical battery allegation related to the non-consensual administration of drugs. This verdict raises alarm bells about patient advocacy and the rights of families in medical settings. The very issue at hand—whether hospitals can impose aggressive treatment protocols without explicit consent—transcends the individual case and highlights broader systemic shortcomings in medical care.
During the trial, statements revealed that Grace's father faced significant obstacles while trying to advocate for his daughter. At one point, he was ejected from the hospital, despite being recognized as her legally designated advocate under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Such actions raise serious concerns regarding the treatment of patients who are vulnerable or incapacitated.
The Schara family's suspicions were rooted in what they described as “standardized inpatient protocols” that emerged during the COVID era. Many families across the country have voiced similar concerns about aggressive treatment avenues that they believe led to harmful outcomes, particularly for patients without robust advocates by their side.
Advocacy groups have begun to emerge, calling attention to the systemic failures in hospitals during the pandemic that led to tragic results for numerous families. They argue that many patients are treated as statistics rather than individuals deserving of personalized care.
Scott Schara's comments about the COVID patient care protocols echo growing frustrations among concerned citizens who fear that the system is prioritizing efficiency over compassionate care. Highlighting a perceived bias against individuals with disabilities, he underscored the striking statistic that individuals with Down Syndrome were significantly more likely to have a Do Not Resuscitate order imposed upon them without proper consent.
While this verdict concludes a chapter in this poignant family's story, it opens a necessary dialogue about the accountability of medical institutions and the rights of patients and their advocates.
In the wake of this case, it’s critical for families to be vigilant, prepared to advocate fiercely for their loved ones, and to question the prevailing protocols that often prioritize hospital policies over individual patient needs.
As the nation grapples with the consequences of its pandemic response, stories like Grace Schara’s serve as powerful reminders of the need for vigilance in protecting patient rights against a backdrop of systemic inadequacies in the healthcare system.
Sources:
cowboystatedaily.com
naturalnews.com
americanthinker.com
In a disheartening verdict that raises serious questions about patient rights and hospital protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic, a jury in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, recently sided with Ascension Hospital in a wrongful death lawsuit connected to the tragic case of Grace Schara.
Grace, a 19-year-old with Down Syndrome, passed away on October 13, 2021, just a week after being admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 symptoms. Her father, Scott Schara, argued that his daughter's death resulted from medical negligence, alleging that the hospital administered intravenous drugs without the family's informed consent.
The jury, after only two hours of deliberation, dismissed many of the family's claims, including the critical battery allegation related to the non-consensual administration of drugs. This verdict raises alarm bells about patient advocacy and the rights of families in medical settings. The very issue at hand—whether hospitals can impose aggressive treatment protocols without explicit consent—transcends the individual case and highlights broader systemic shortcomings in medical care.
During the trial, statements revealed that Grace's father faced significant obstacles while trying to advocate for his daughter. At one point, he was ejected from the hospital, despite being recognized as her legally designated advocate under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Such actions raise serious concerns regarding the treatment of patients who are vulnerable or incapacitated.
The Schara family's suspicions were rooted in what they described as “standardized inpatient protocols” that emerged during the COVID era. Many families across the country have voiced similar concerns about aggressive treatment avenues that they believe led to harmful outcomes, particularly for patients without robust advocates by their side.
Advocacy groups have begun to emerge, calling attention to the systemic failures in hospitals during the pandemic that led to tragic results for numerous families. They argue that many patients are treated as statistics rather than individuals deserving of personalized care.
Scott Schara's comments about the COVID patient care protocols echo growing frustrations among concerned citizens who fear that the system is prioritizing efficiency over compassionate care. Highlighting a perceived bias against individuals with disabilities, he underscored the striking statistic that individuals with Down Syndrome were significantly more likely to have a Do Not Resuscitate order imposed upon them without proper consent.
While this verdict concludes a chapter in this poignant family's story, it opens a necessary dialogue about the accountability of medical institutions and the rights of patients and their advocates.
In the wake of this case, it’s critical for families to be vigilant, prepared to advocate fiercely for their loved ones, and to question the prevailing protocols that often prioritize hospital policies over individual patient needs.
As the nation grapples with the consequences of its pandemic response, stories like Grace Schara’s serve as powerful reminders of the need for vigilance in protecting patient rights against a backdrop of systemic inadequacies in the healthcare system.
Sources:
cowboystatedaily.com
naturalnews.com
americanthinker.com
Latest News