**Outrage in San Francisco: Mandatory Ethnic Studies Course Sparks Parental Backlash**
The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) is facing fierce criticism from parents after the board announced a new mandatory ethnic studies course for graduation.
Parents across the city are raising alarm bells as their children will now be required to take this two-semester class, with topics that explore "structural racism" and "colonialism."
This decision comes on the heels of a deeply controversial grading policy aimed at lowering academic standards, which has already sparked protests from concerned citizens.
Despite the district’s efforts to prioritize a social agenda, many parents argue that their children are struggling to meet basic proficiency in core subjects like math and English.
They view the new ethnic studies requirement as yet another distraction that diverts attention from fundamental educational needs.
The push for a mandatory course flies in the face of the principles of educational choice, an issue that has become increasingly pertinent across the nation.
What's more alarming is the lack of transparency surrounding the decision-making process. Parents learned about the course after it had already been approved, raising questions about the district’s commitment to parental input and academic integrity.
Previously, parents had the option to opt-out of the course, but those choices have now been stripped away, leaving families with little back-up.
This draconian policy change has parents worried not just about the content of the curriculum, but about the implications for their children’s futures.
With the job market growing increasingly competitive, parents argue that students should have the flexibility to invest time in subjects that better prepare them for success in their careers.
Furthermore, some of the course content has raised eyebrows due to its highly political and questionable material, which critics claim promotes division rather than unity.
In one instance, a reading assignment compared capitalism to racism, a suggestion that many see as fraught with bias and a misunderstanding of economic principles.
The concern extends beyond just a few controversial assignments.
Many educators have openly defended material considered offensive, under the guise of promoting critical dialogue—an approach that raises serious questions about the appropriateness of such teachings in today’s classrooms.
In the face of these challenges, one must consider the state of educational priorities in a district marred by its political correctness.
As alarming policies continue to emerge, the San Francisco community finds itself at a crossroads between the pursuit of genuine education and an agenda driven by ideology.
One thing is clear: parents want their children focused on essential subjects that can build futures, not earn degrees in political science under questionable pretenses.
As the cry for accountability grows, will the SFUSD listen, or will it double down on its controversial approach?
Time will tell, but for now, the voices of concerned parents are making waves, echoing the desire for education that values freedom of choice and merit over ideology.
Sources:
zerohedge.comendtimeheadlines.orgjonathanturley.org