San Francisco Schools Reject Outrageous Grading Policy Proposal
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 40 days ago
**Outrageous Education Reform Attempt Flops in San Francisco Amid Public Outcry**
In a stunning turnaround, the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) abandoned its controversial "Grading for Equity" proposal this week, following intense backlash from parents, educators, and even members of the Democratic Party.
The proposed plan, championed by SFUSD Superintendent Maria Su, sought to overhaul traditional grading standards in a bid to achieve equity among students.
Under the new scheme, conventional measures like homework assignments and regular assessments would be disregarded in favor of a single final exam score, which students could retake until they achieved a passing grade.
Critics, including a former attorney from the Clinton and Obama administrations, characterized the approach as a superficial attempt to alleviate disparities while sacrificing genuine academic rigor.
A concerned school-board member leaked the agenda to The Voice of San Francisco, revealing both the breadth of frustration with the proposed changes and the lack of transparency from district administration.
Parents echoed these sentiments at the school board meeting, expressing concern that such policies would send a troubling message to their children about the value of hard work and personal accountability.
One parent, representative of many voices in the community, articulated concerns that this approach undermines the essence of education: "What possible message can they take from this plan other than to conclude that working hard and applying oneself is for suckers?"
The proposal faced immediate and stern criticism not only from concerned parents but also from educational experts who argued that it would not only fail to prepare students for the demands of college and the workforce but could also exacerbate existing disparities rather than rectify them.
SFUSD's Superintendent Su acknowledged the widespread dissent, stating, “It’s clear there are a lot of questions, concerns, and misinformation with this proposal.” In a notable shift, she declared her decision to scrap the initiative to foster a more thorough dialogue with the community.
The “Grading for Equity” plan seemed to be grounded in the increasingly prevalent trend of prioritizing subjective measures over established academic standards. Supporters claimed it was essential for promoting fairness, yet the evidence suggested otherwise.
Previous implementations of similar grading methodologies in other school districts have failed to yield positive academic outcomes, indicating that lowering benchmarks may ultimately inhibit, rather than enhance, student performance.
This debacle in San Francisco serves as a clear reminder of the necessity of maintaining academic standards that promote excellence rather than mediocrity.
With political figures, both conservative and moderate, calling for a return to principled education policies, it is a wake-up call for those who believe in the importance of hard work and accountability in preparing the leaders of tomorrow.
As we move forward, it is crucial that parents and educators stand firm against misguided reforms that place ideology above education, ensuring that our schools remain places of genuine learning and achievement.
Sources:
thenewamerican.com
endtimeheadlines.org
thepostmillennial.com
In a stunning turnaround, the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) abandoned its controversial "Grading for Equity" proposal this week, following intense backlash from parents, educators, and even members of the Democratic Party.
The proposed plan, championed by SFUSD Superintendent Maria Su, sought to overhaul traditional grading standards in a bid to achieve equity among students.
Under the new scheme, conventional measures like homework assignments and regular assessments would be disregarded in favor of a single final exam score, which students could retake until they achieved a passing grade.
Critics, including a former attorney from the Clinton and Obama administrations, characterized the approach as a superficial attempt to alleviate disparities while sacrificing genuine academic rigor.
A concerned school-board member leaked the agenda to The Voice of San Francisco, revealing both the breadth of frustration with the proposed changes and the lack of transparency from district administration.
Parents echoed these sentiments at the school board meeting, expressing concern that such policies would send a troubling message to their children about the value of hard work and personal accountability.
One parent, representative of many voices in the community, articulated concerns that this approach undermines the essence of education: "What possible message can they take from this plan other than to conclude that working hard and applying oneself is for suckers?"
The proposal faced immediate and stern criticism not only from concerned parents but also from educational experts who argued that it would not only fail to prepare students for the demands of college and the workforce but could also exacerbate existing disparities rather than rectify them.
SFUSD's Superintendent Su acknowledged the widespread dissent, stating, “It’s clear there are a lot of questions, concerns, and misinformation with this proposal.” In a notable shift, she declared her decision to scrap the initiative to foster a more thorough dialogue with the community.
The “Grading for Equity” plan seemed to be grounded in the increasingly prevalent trend of prioritizing subjective measures over established academic standards. Supporters claimed it was essential for promoting fairness, yet the evidence suggested otherwise.
Previous implementations of similar grading methodologies in other school districts have failed to yield positive academic outcomes, indicating that lowering benchmarks may ultimately inhibit, rather than enhance, student performance.
This debacle in San Francisco serves as a clear reminder of the necessity of maintaining academic standards that promote excellence rather than mediocrity.
With political figures, both conservative and moderate, calling for a return to principled education policies, it is a wake-up call for those who believe in the importance of hard work and accountability in preparing the leaders of tomorrow.
As we move forward, it is crucial that parents and educators stand firm against misguided reforms that place ideology above education, ensuring that our schools remain places of genuine learning and achievement.
Sources:
thenewamerican.com
endtimeheadlines.org
thepostmillennial.com
Latest News