Judge Upholds IRS-ICE Cooperation for Immigration Enforcement
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
**Victory for Immigration Enforcement: Judge Affirms IRS-ICE Cooperation**
In a significant ruling that strengthens immigration enforcement, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich denied a request to block the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from sharing taxpayer information with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
This decision clears a path for the IRS to collaborate with ICE under a new agreement aimed at addressing criminal immigration issues.
The case was brought forward by several left-leaning nonprofit organizations, including Centro de Trabajadores Unidos and Somos Un Pueblo Unido, which argued that the data-sharing agreement violated taxpayer confidentiality laws.
However, Judge Friedrich determined that the cooperation between the IRS and ICE is legal, provided that proper procedures are followed.
Her 16-page opinion explicitly stated that the IRS can indeed share Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) data for the sake of criminal immigration enforcement.
The ruling further emphasizes that the IRS is legally obligated to assist federal agencies conducting criminal investigations, so long as they submit valid requests.
As long as the agency can identify the taxpayer in question, it is required to comply with these requests.
This ruling comes at a pivotal moment in American politics, especially as the Trump administration, now in its second term, continues to prioritize immigration enforcement.
The decision is set to enhance ICE's ability to identify and prosecute individuals who are in the country illegally and have disregarded deportation orders.
Critics of the ruling, however, argue that such measures might hinder the interests of immigrants who are filing taxes in good faith.
Nevertheless, Judge Friedrich noted that the plaintiffs could not demonstrate a likelihood that the IRS disclosures would facilitate civil immigration enforcement, thus lacking legal standing to challenge the agreement.
This ruling is a clear indication that the judiciary is supporting the administration’s tough stance on illegal immigration, reinforcing the notion that immigration laws will be enforced without exception.
As America moves forward, this decision reflects a growing commitment to uphold the rule of law and protect the integrity of the nation’s immigration system.
Sources:
independentsentinel.com
revolver.news
trendingpoliticsnews.com
In a significant ruling that strengthens immigration enforcement, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich denied a request to block the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from sharing taxpayer information with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
This decision clears a path for the IRS to collaborate with ICE under a new agreement aimed at addressing criminal immigration issues.
The case was brought forward by several left-leaning nonprofit organizations, including Centro de Trabajadores Unidos and Somos Un Pueblo Unido, which argued that the data-sharing agreement violated taxpayer confidentiality laws.
However, Judge Friedrich determined that the cooperation between the IRS and ICE is legal, provided that proper procedures are followed.
Her 16-page opinion explicitly stated that the IRS can indeed share Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) data for the sake of criminal immigration enforcement.
The ruling further emphasizes that the IRS is legally obligated to assist federal agencies conducting criminal investigations, so long as they submit valid requests.
As long as the agency can identify the taxpayer in question, it is required to comply with these requests.
This ruling comes at a pivotal moment in American politics, especially as the Trump administration, now in its second term, continues to prioritize immigration enforcement.
The decision is set to enhance ICE's ability to identify and prosecute individuals who are in the country illegally and have disregarded deportation orders.
Critics of the ruling, however, argue that such measures might hinder the interests of immigrants who are filing taxes in good faith.
Nevertheless, Judge Friedrich noted that the plaintiffs could not demonstrate a likelihood that the IRS disclosures would facilitate civil immigration enforcement, thus lacking legal standing to challenge the agreement.
This ruling is a clear indication that the judiciary is supporting the administration’s tough stance on illegal immigration, reinforcing the notion that immigration laws will be enforced without exception.
As America moves forward, this decision reflects a growing commitment to uphold the rule of law and protect the integrity of the nation’s immigration system.
Sources:
independentsentinel.com
revolver.news
trendingpoliticsnews.com
Latest News