States Mismanage EV Funds, Blame Trump Administration Instead
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
Recent actions by a coalition of 16 states and the District of Columbia, led by California and Washington, have ignited a firestorm over the allocation of electric vehicle (EV) charger funding initially approved under the Trump administration.
These states are suing over $5 billion set aside for EV infrastructure, which the current administration has put on hold.
The lawsuit claims that the Federal Highway Administration has improperly withheld funds necessary for advancing electric vehicle infrastructure, despite a congressional mandate in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) of 2021.
However, a closer examination reveals that many states involved in the lawsuit have failed to utilize allocations awarded for this purpose.
Of the $3.3 billion in funding already distributed, a majority of the plaintiff states have yet to complete any operational EV chargers, raising questions about their commitment and efficacy in deploying the funds.
For example, California secured $302 million since fiscal year 2021 but has made minimal progress in establishing NEVI-funded chargers, while Washington has similarly received funds without corresponding results.
Critics point out that despite the outcry from these states regarding federal oversight and funding, there is a glaring irony in their inability to act on the resources provided to them.
The lawsuit argues that states should receive their share of funding unless there's a failure to submit a plan or carry it out, yet it appears that the real issue may be a lack of planning and execution on their part.
In the midst of this ongoing debate, social media influencer and golfer Phil Mickelson has publicly lambasted California Governor Gavin Newsom.
Mickelson criticized Newsom's attempts to blame Trump for the state's struggles, quipping about California's expensive and incomplete high-speed rail project as a prime example of government inefficiency.
Such sentiments resonate with many conservatives who feel that state governments should take responsibility for the funds they receive rather than shifting blame to the federal level when things do not go as planned.
As the conversation surrounding electric vehicle infrastructure funding evolves, it is clear that accountability and transparency are crucial.
Moving forward, the expectation will be for those states involved in the lawsuit to demonstrate tangible progress and effective use of federal resources — a standard that should apply to all levels of government.
This situation serves as a reminder that political posturing can often overshadow real issues of competence and responsibility, particularly when taxpayer dollars are at stake.
Sources:
justthenews.com
outkick.com
independentsentinel.com
These states are suing over $5 billion set aside for EV infrastructure, which the current administration has put on hold.
The lawsuit claims that the Federal Highway Administration has improperly withheld funds necessary for advancing electric vehicle infrastructure, despite a congressional mandate in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) of 2021.
However, a closer examination reveals that many states involved in the lawsuit have failed to utilize allocations awarded for this purpose.
Of the $3.3 billion in funding already distributed, a majority of the plaintiff states have yet to complete any operational EV chargers, raising questions about their commitment and efficacy in deploying the funds.
For example, California secured $302 million since fiscal year 2021 but has made minimal progress in establishing NEVI-funded chargers, while Washington has similarly received funds without corresponding results.
Critics point out that despite the outcry from these states regarding federal oversight and funding, there is a glaring irony in their inability to act on the resources provided to them.
The lawsuit argues that states should receive their share of funding unless there's a failure to submit a plan or carry it out, yet it appears that the real issue may be a lack of planning and execution on their part.
In the midst of this ongoing debate, social media influencer and golfer Phil Mickelson has publicly lambasted California Governor Gavin Newsom.
Mickelson criticized Newsom's attempts to blame Trump for the state's struggles, quipping about California's expensive and incomplete high-speed rail project as a prime example of government inefficiency.
Such sentiments resonate with many conservatives who feel that state governments should take responsibility for the funds they receive rather than shifting blame to the federal level when things do not go as planned.
As the conversation surrounding electric vehicle infrastructure funding evolves, it is clear that accountability and transparency are crucial.
Moving forward, the expectation will be for those states involved in the lawsuit to demonstrate tangible progress and effective use of federal resources — a standard that should apply to all levels of government.
This situation serves as a reminder that political posturing can often overshadow real issues of competence and responsibility, particularly when taxpayer dollars are at stake.
Sources:
justthenews.com
outkick.com
independentsentinel.com
Latest News