Colorado Democrats' Radical Bill Threatens Parental Rights
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 15 hours ago
**Alarming Assault on Parental Rights in Colorado: Democrats Push Radical Trans Bill**
In a shocking display of governmental overreach, Colorado Democrats are advancing the “Kelly Loving Act” (HB 1312), a bill that threatens to strip parental rights and pave the way for state-sanctioned child transitions.
At its core, this legislation is billed as a means to protect transgender individuals, but it is anything but protective. Under HB 1312, parents could face the dire consequence of losing custody of their children if they refuse to affirm their child's choice to “socially” or “medically transition.”
The bill's provisions highlight an alarming trend toward government intervention in intimate family matters. Section 2 stipulates that misgendering or deadnaming a child could be classified as abuse. This would effectively criminalize loving parental guidance in favor of a state-mandated ideology, forcing parents to adhere to a narrative that often conflicts with their beliefs and values.
Further encroachments come with the introduction of deadnaming and misgendering into Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act, thereby censoring speech and limiting the ability of businesses and individuals to express their opinions freely. As seen in the past with cases against individuals like Christian baker Jack Phillips, this legislation could be weaponized by state agencies against those who refuse to conform to the mandated terminology surrounding gender identity.
The ramifications of HB 1312 are extensive, including the imposition on schools to enforce the use of a student’s preferred pronouns and abolishing sex-based dress codes. This approach signifies a deeper commitment among radical legislators to impose their ideologies on impressionable young minds, undermining the role of parents as primary caregivers.
Recent developments have seen certain prominent LGBTQ advocacy groups, including One Colorado and the Gill Foundation, backpedal on their support for the bill, expressing concerns over its extreme measures. This growing opposition highlights the contention even among groups that initially championed similar legislation, acknowledging that the bill as written could create more harm than good.
Many concerned citizens have rallied against HB 1312, voicing their dismay during public testimonies, where the legislature limited opposition voice time to only four hours. As reported, over 400 individuals showed up to oppose the bill, illustrating a significant disconnect between the state legislature and the constituents they claim to represent.
Erin Friday, a lifelong Democrat and attorney, aptly noted the perilous inversion of the parent-child relationship that the bill proposes. In her words, it illustrates a hallmark of totalitarianism, where children would effectively hold authority over their parents, a deeply troubling shift from traditional family dynamics.
Even in the face of fierce opposition from constituents and organizations alike, Colorado Democrats pushed forward with this radical legislation. With Governor Gavin Newsom’s recent veto of a similar California bill serving as a cautionary tale, one must question whether Colorado's lawmakers are prioritizing radical ideology over the protection of families and children's well-being.
As the clock ticks down in the current legislative session, it is imperative for citizens to remain vigilant. HB 1312 represents an alarming trend, with potential repercussions reaching beyond Colorado if such measures begin to spread to other states. The preservation of parental rights and the integrity of family relationships hang in the balance.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
ctvnews.ca
alphanews.org
In a shocking display of governmental overreach, Colorado Democrats are advancing the “Kelly Loving Act” (HB 1312), a bill that threatens to strip parental rights and pave the way for state-sanctioned child transitions.
At its core, this legislation is billed as a means to protect transgender individuals, but it is anything but protective. Under HB 1312, parents could face the dire consequence of losing custody of their children if they refuse to affirm their child's choice to “socially” or “medically transition.”
The bill's provisions highlight an alarming trend toward government intervention in intimate family matters. Section 2 stipulates that misgendering or deadnaming a child could be classified as abuse. This would effectively criminalize loving parental guidance in favor of a state-mandated ideology, forcing parents to adhere to a narrative that often conflicts with their beliefs and values.
Further encroachments come with the introduction of deadnaming and misgendering into Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act, thereby censoring speech and limiting the ability of businesses and individuals to express their opinions freely. As seen in the past with cases against individuals like Christian baker Jack Phillips, this legislation could be weaponized by state agencies against those who refuse to conform to the mandated terminology surrounding gender identity.
The ramifications of HB 1312 are extensive, including the imposition on schools to enforce the use of a student’s preferred pronouns and abolishing sex-based dress codes. This approach signifies a deeper commitment among radical legislators to impose their ideologies on impressionable young minds, undermining the role of parents as primary caregivers.
Recent developments have seen certain prominent LGBTQ advocacy groups, including One Colorado and the Gill Foundation, backpedal on their support for the bill, expressing concerns over its extreme measures. This growing opposition highlights the contention even among groups that initially championed similar legislation, acknowledging that the bill as written could create more harm than good.
Many concerned citizens have rallied against HB 1312, voicing their dismay during public testimonies, where the legislature limited opposition voice time to only four hours. As reported, over 400 individuals showed up to oppose the bill, illustrating a significant disconnect between the state legislature and the constituents they claim to represent.
Erin Friday, a lifelong Democrat and attorney, aptly noted the perilous inversion of the parent-child relationship that the bill proposes. In her words, it illustrates a hallmark of totalitarianism, where children would effectively hold authority over their parents, a deeply troubling shift from traditional family dynamics.
Even in the face of fierce opposition from constituents and organizations alike, Colorado Democrats pushed forward with this radical legislation. With Governor Gavin Newsom’s recent veto of a similar California bill serving as a cautionary tale, one must question whether Colorado's lawmakers are prioritizing radical ideology over the protection of families and children's well-being.
As the clock ticks down in the current legislative session, it is imperative for citizens to remain vigilant. HB 1312 represents an alarming trend, with potential repercussions reaching beyond Colorado if such measures begin to spread to other states. The preservation of parental rights and the integrity of family relationships hang in the balance.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
ctvnews.ca
alphanews.org
Latest News