New York Times Ignores Serious Fraud Allegations Against ActBlue
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
The New York Times has come under fire once again for its apparent bias in covering the recent directive from President Donald Trump to launch an investigation into ActBlue, a major fundraising entity for Democrats.
Trump’s call to the Department of Justice to scrutinize ActBlue for potential violations of federal law has raised eyebrows, especially in light of mounting evidence suggesting the platform may facilitate illegal foreign contributions and “straw” donations.
In an ironic twist, the Times dismissed Trump’s directive as merely a partisan maneuver aimed at undermining the Democrats. This response appears to ignore serious allegations against ActBlue, which, according to various reports, has been linked to significant fraud campaigns—some with foreign connections.
Scott Walter, president of the Capital Research Center, expressed disappointment with the Times' coverage, claiming it conveniently glossed over crucial facts about ActBlue’s questionable practices. Despite overwhelming concerns, including internal documents that reveal at least 22 significant fraud campaigns detected by the organization, the Times opted to frame Trump’s inquiry as a partisan ploy.
The recent reports demonstrate that the once-unquestioned reliability of ActBlue is now marred by a troubling history of fundraising irregularities and governance issues, including the departure of key compliance personnel. Even as internal chaos unfolds, the Democratic Party continues to rally around ActBlue, fearing the ramifications of a thorough investigation.
By painting Trump’s initiative as a politically motivated attack, the New York Times may be attempting to protect not only the Democrats’ electoral chances but also the very integrity of American elections. This cover-up suggests a troubling trend where mainstream media prioritizes partisan interests over the pursuit of truth and accountability in campaign finance.
It’s clear that when allegations of misconduct arise, especially regarding significant Democratic backers like ActBlue, the response from certain media outlets can often be one of denial rather than investigation. The American public deserves transparency in campaign financing—not the selective reporting that seems to rule the day.
As calls for accountability grow louder within the Republican Party, Americans will be watching closely to see if those in power will uphold the integrity of our electoral system, or if the truth will remain buried under layers of partisan spin.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
independentsentinel.com
rumble.com
Trump’s call to the Department of Justice to scrutinize ActBlue for potential violations of federal law has raised eyebrows, especially in light of mounting evidence suggesting the platform may facilitate illegal foreign contributions and “straw” donations.
In an ironic twist, the Times dismissed Trump’s directive as merely a partisan maneuver aimed at undermining the Democrats. This response appears to ignore serious allegations against ActBlue, which, according to various reports, has been linked to significant fraud campaigns—some with foreign connections.
Scott Walter, president of the Capital Research Center, expressed disappointment with the Times' coverage, claiming it conveniently glossed over crucial facts about ActBlue’s questionable practices. Despite overwhelming concerns, including internal documents that reveal at least 22 significant fraud campaigns detected by the organization, the Times opted to frame Trump’s inquiry as a partisan ploy.
The recent reports demonstrate that the once-unquestioned reliability of ActBlue is now marred by a troubling history of fundraising irregularities and governance issues, including the departure of key compliance personnel. Even as internal chaos unfolds, the Democratic Party continues to rally around ActBlue, fearing the ramifications of a thorough investigation.
By painting Trump’s initiative as a politically motivated attack, the New York Times may be attempting to protect not only the Democrats’ electoral chances but also the very integrity of American elections. This cover-up suggests a troubling trend where mainstream media prioritizes partisan interests over the pursuit of truth and accountability in campaign finance.
It’s clear that when allegations of misconduct arise, especially regarding significant Democratic backers like ActBlue, the response from certain media outlets can often be one of denial rather than investigation. The American public deserves transparency in campaign financing—not the selective reporting that seems to rule the day.
As calls for accountability grow louder within the Republican Party, Americans will be watching closely to see if those in power will uphold the integrity of our electoral system, or if the truth will remain buried under layers of partisan spin.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
independentsentinel.com
rumble.com
Latest News