ACLU Exposed: Legal Manipulations Undermining Justice System
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 80 days ago
Unmasking a Deception: The ACLU’s Legal Manipulations Come to Light
In a stunning revelation, the ongoing saga of legal activism has taken a new turn, highlighting the depths to which leftist organizations will go to push their agenda under the guise of justice.
Recent reports have surfaced indicating that an ACLU attorney may have engaged in unethical conduct, violating established courtroom protocols for personal gain.
This scandal centers around the Alien Enemies Act, where ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt attempted to influence a federal judge directly after his request to halt deportations was denied.
Judge James Hendrix of Texas has brought attention to a problematic ex parte communication, a serious breach of legal protocol, where Gelernt attempted to lobby the judge outside the established legal framework.
In a recorded message, Gelernt called Judge Hendrix seeking broader relief, aiming to expand the case to include any immigrant affected by the Alien Enemies Act, despite a previous agreement that the government would not deport the two individuals specifically mentioned in the suit.
Gelernt's actions raise questions about whether such communications have occurred previously, as Judge Hendrix suggested that Gelernt might have employed similar tactics with another judge in a related case.
This kind of manipulation is emblematic of a troubling trend in which activist groups like the ACLU attempt to twist the judicial process to fit their narrative, using pressure tactics when court rulings do not favor their agenda.
As conservatives have long warned, the left's strategy has increasingly moved from winning public opinion to controlling the courtroom, threatening the very integrity of the justice system.
Critics argue that this incident is not an isolated occurrence but highlights a broader issue within the judicial landscape where rules are bent or ignored to achieve desired outcomes.
Judge Hendrix's stance reflects a growing resistance against the aggressive tactics employed by activist organizations, aiming to protect the rule of law and uphold judicial standards.
This situation invites further scrutiny of how the ACLU operates and emphasizes the importance of accountability for those who wield legal power.
As the dust settles, it will be critical to assess the implications of this event not just for the individuals involved, but for the future of legal integrity in America.
The American public deserves to know whether the law will be upheld without bias or if it will continue to be influenced by the machinations of those who skirt the rules for political gain.
Sources:
cnbc.com
redstate.com
revolver.news
In a stunning revelation, the ongoing saga of legal activism has taken a new turn, highlighting the depths to which leftist organizations will go to push their agenda under the guise of justice.
Recent reports have surfaced indicating that an ACLU attorney may have engaged in unethical conduct, violating established courtroom protocols for personal gain.
This scandal centers around the Alien Enemies Act, where ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt attempted to influence a federal judge directly after his request to halt deportations was denied.
Judge James Hendrix of Texas has brought attention to a problematic ex parte communication, a serious breach of legal protocol, where Gelernt attempted to lobby the judge outside the established legal framework.
In a recorded message, Gelernt called Judge Hendrix seeking broader relief, aiming to expand the case to include any immigrant affected by the Alien Enemies Act, despite a previous agreement that the government would not deport the two individuals specifically mentioned in the suit.
Gelernt's actions raise questions about whether such communications have occurred previously, as Judge Hendrix suggested that Gelernt might have employed similar tactics with another judge in a related case.
This kind of manipulation is emblematic of a troubling trend in which activist groups like the ACLU attempt to twist the judicial process to fit their narrative, using pressure tactics when court rulings do not favor their agenda.
As conservatives have long warned, the left's strategy has increasingly moved from winning public opinion to controlling the courtroom, threatening the very integrity of the justice system.
Critics argue that this incident is not an isolated occurrence but highlights a broader issue within the judicial landscape where rules are bent or ignored to achieve desired outcomes.
Judge Hendrix's stance reflects a growing resistance against the aggressive tactics employed by activist organizations, aiming to protect the rule of law and uphold judicial standards.
This situation invites further scrutiny of how the ACLU operates and emphasizes the importance of accountability for those who wield legal power.
As the dust settles, it will be critical to assess the implications of this event not just for the individuals involved, but for the future of legal integrity in America.
The American public deserves to know whether the law will be upheld without bias or if it will continue to be influenced by the machinations of those who skirt the rules for political gain.
Sources:
cnbc.com
redstate.com
revolver.news
Latest News