Kill Switch Jail: A Threat to American Freedom
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Dangerous Overreach: The Imminent Threat of 'Kill Switch Jail' Looms Over American Drivers**
As we approach the model year 2026, a new mandate threatens to strip American drivers of their freedom and autonomy, ushering in what many are calling a dystopian nightmare: the "kill switch jail."
This initiative, cloaked under the guise of safety, is a provision in Section 24220 of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, signed into law by President Biden.
It requires every new vehicle sold after 2026 to be equipped with advanced technology that could effectively disable a car if it detects impaired driving or distraction.
Proponents argue that it aims to save lives, pointing to the alarming statistics of alcohol-related fatalities. However, this ambitious plan comes with severe consequences that could significantly hinder the rights of law-abiding citizens.
Imagine driving along a familiar route only to find your car abruptly shutting down due to a suspected error in the technology's judgment.
The fear of having a computer dictate your driving capabilities is chilling, especially when it lacks the understanding of context that a human driver possesses.
This technological overreach not only puts drivers’ safety at risk but also raises significant concerns regarding privacy and government surveillance.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) has been a staunch opponent of this mandate, labeling it a “privacy nightmare” fraught with potential for misuse.
In recent congressional sessions, Massie attempted to spearhead an amendment to defund this problematic provision but faced a narrow defeat, capturing the split among Republicans in the House.
This division highlights a growing rift within party lines, as some Republicans chose to align with Democrats on what many view as an excessive federal overreach into personal freedoms.
Critics argue that the technology has not been adequately tested, with false positives posing real dangers.
If a driver is flagged erroneously, they could find themselves stranded without recourse or explanation, akin to being locked in "kill switch jail."
The unprecedented surveillance capabilities of these vehicles may also lead to a slippery slope where personal data could be misused, further entrenching a potential surveillance state on our roads.
Addressing concerns around drunk driving should certainly be a priority, yet blanket mandates across all new vehicles seem to disregard the nuances of individual circumstances.
The mandate’s anticipated implementation brings with it a burden of additional costs—hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars could be added to the price of each vehicle due to the required technology.
This additional expense could dissuade many from upgrading their vehicles, impacting the auto industry and hard-working families striving to get ahead.
As we approach the deadline, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has yet to finalize practical guidelines for the technology, leaving American consumers in a state of uncertainty and confusion.
Is this truly about saving lives, or is it just another layer of bureaucratic control, veiled in safety rhetoric?
The call for freedom and a return to common sense in policymaking has never been clearer.
As Americans, we must remain vigilant against mandates that endanger our liberties in the name of safety.
Time is running out to rein in this overreach that could redefine the very nature of driving in America.
Sources:
endtimeheadlines.org
theblaze.com
stream.org
As we approach the model year 2026, a new mandate threatens to strip American drivers of their freedom and autonomy, ushering in what many are calling a dystopian nightmare: the "kill switch jail."
This initiative, cloaked under the guise of safety, is a provision in Section 24220 of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, signed into law by President Biden.
It requires every new vehicle sold after 2026 to be equipped with advanced technology that could effectively disable a car if it detects impaired driving or distraction.
Proponents argue that it aims to save lives, pointing to the alarming statistics of alcohol-related fatalities. However, this ambitious plan comes with severe consequences that could significantly hinder the rights of law-abiding citizens.
Imagine driving along a familiar route only to find your car abruptly shutting down due to a suspected error in the technology's judgment.
The fear of having a computer dictate your driving capabilities is chilling, especially when it lacks the understanding of context that a human driver possesses.
This technological overreach not only puts drivers’ safety at risk but also raises significant concerns regarding privacy and government surveillance.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) has been a staunch opponent of this mandate, labeling it a “privacy nightmare” fraught with potential for misuse.
In recent congressional sessions, Massie attempted to spearhead an amendment to defund this problematic provision but faced a narrow defeat, capturing the split among Republicans in the House.
This division highlights a growing rift within party lines, as some Republicans chose to align with Democrats on what many view as an excessive federal overreach into personal freedoms.
Critics argue that the technology has not been adequately tested, with false positives posing real dangers.
If a driver is flagged erroneously, they could find themselves stranded without recourse or explanation, akin to being locked in "kill switch jail."
The unprecedented surveillance capabilities of these vehicles may also lead to a slippery slope where personal data could be misused, further entrenching a potential surveillance state on our roads.
Addressing concerns around drunk driving should certainly be a priority, yet blanket mandates across all new vehicles seem to disregard the nuances of individual circumstances.
The mandate’s anticipated implementation brings with it a burden of additional costs—hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars could be added to the price of each vehicle due to the required technology.
This additional expense could dissuade many from upgrading their vehicles, impacting the auto industry and hard-working families striving to get ahead.
As we approach the deadline, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has yet to finalize practical guidelines for the technology, leaving American consumers in a state of uncertainty and confusion.
Is this truly about saving lives, or is it just another layer of bureaucratic control, veiled in safety rhetoric?
The call for freedom and a return to common sense in policymaking has never been clearer.
As Americans, we must remain vigilant against mandates that endanger our liberties in the name of safety.
Time is running out to rein in this overreach that could redefine the very nature of driving in America.
Sources:
endtimeheadlines.org
theblaze.com
stream.org
Latest News