Expose Susan Crawford's Campaign Fraud and Election Manipulation
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 19 hours ago
**Justice for Election Integrity: Susan Crawford’s Alleged Campaign Fraud Under Fire**
In a shocking revelation, independent journalist Peter Bernegger has uncovered evidence that suggests Wisconsin liberal candidate Susan Crawford engaged in serious election fraud during her recent campaign.
Crawford, who notably opposed the state’s voter ID law, appears to have benefited from a significant increase in voter turnout—almost 100,000 votes in her race, compared to around 77,000 in the previous election, raising eyebrows about the legitimacy of her win.
Bernegger has reported that a 45-page criminal complaint has been filed with the FBI, alleging that Crawford participated in “Smurfing,” a method of money laundering that undermines the sanctity of our electoral process. This scheme, coupled with the lax oversight of her funding sources, calls into question the integrity of the voting results.
In another blow to her credibility, reports show that the Wisconsin Democratic Party and various actors within her campaign may have orchestrated a vast network of illegal contributions and questionable donations. This investigation reflects a broader concern among voters about transparency and accountability in elections—a sentiment echoed by many across the political spectrum.
Further scrutiny is being directed at ActBlue, a fundraising platform associated with Crawford's campaign that was found to have adopted looser donation standards. A congressional investigation revealed that not only did ActBlue allow contributions without necessary verification measures but also received money from foreign sources. This alarming development poses a significant threat to the principle that American elections should be decided by American voters, not influenced by foreign interests.
As more information unfolds surrounding Crawford's funding and the dubious practices associated with her campaign, calls for accountability are growing louder. Supporters of election integrity are urging for an impartial investigation that not only addresses Crawford’s actions but also looks into the larger implications of fundraising practices that threaten the democratic process.
As the Republican Party continues to champion the cause of election integrity, incidents such as these serve as critical reminders of the ongoing battles against fraud and manipulation. The American public deserves reassurance that their votes are indeed protected, and that those who seek to compromise the electoral process will be held accountable.
With rising concerns over election security, the need for stringent verification measures and adherence to campaign laws is more important than ever. The potential consequences of lax standards and misconduct—seen here in the case of Susan Crawford—must serve as a clarion call for all politicians to prioritize transparency and integrity in their electoral endeavors.
Sources:
cdm.press
justthenews.com
lifenews.com
In a shocking revelation, independent journalist Peter Bernegger has uncovered evidence that suggests Wisconsin liberal candidate Susan Crawford engaged in serious election fraud during her recent campaign.
Crawford, who notably opposed the state’s voter ID law, appears to have benefited from a significant increase in voter turnout—almost 100,000 votes in her race, compared to around 77,000 in the previous election, raising eyebrows about the legitimacy of her win.
Bernegger has reported that a 45-page criminal complaint has been filed with the FBI, alleging that Crawford participated in “Smurfing,” a method of money laundering that undermines the sanctity of our electoral process. This scheme, coupled with the lax oversight of her funding sources, calls into question the integrity of the voting results.
In another blow to her credibility, reports show that the Wisconsin Democratic Party and various actors within her campaign may have orchestrated a vast network of illegal contributions and questionable donations. This investigation reflects a broader concern among voters about transparency and accountability in elections—a sentiment echoed by many across the political spectrum.
Further scrutiny is being directed at ActBlue, a fundraising platform associated with Crawford's campaign that was found to have adopted looser donation standards. A congressional investigation revealed that not only did ActBlue allow contributions without necessary verification measures but also received money from foreign sources. This alarming development poses a significant threat to the principle that American elections should be decided by American voters, not influenced by foreign interests.
As more information unfolds surrounding Crawford's funding and the dubious practices associated with her campaign, calls for accountability are growing louder. Supporters of election integrity are urging for an impartial investigation that not only addresses Crawford’s actions but also looks into the larger implications of fundraising practices that threaten the democratic process.
As the Republican Party continues to champion the cause of election integrity, incidents such as these serve as critical reminders of the ongoing battles against fraud and manipulation. The American public deserves reassurance that their votes are indeed protected, and that those who seek to compromise the electoral process will be held accountable.
With rising concerns over election security, the need for stringent verification measures and adherence to campaign laws is more important than ever. The potential consequences of lax standards and misconduct—seen here in the case of Susan Crawford—must serve as a clarion call for all politicians to prioritize transparency and integrity in their electoral endeavors.
Sources:
cdm.press
justthenews.com
lifenews.com
Latest News