Bold Action Against Judicial Overreach on Immigration Deportation
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 1 day ago
**Judicial Overreach: Congressman Proposes Bold Action Against Blocked Deportation Efforts**
In an alarming display of judicial overreach, a U.S. District judge has thwarted President Trump's lawful attempts to deport members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona is responding to this affront with a groundbreaking proposal to circumvent the traditional impeachment process.
In introducing new legislation, Biggs seeks to remove Judge James Boasberg, arguing that the judge has failed to maintain the "good behavior" standard required under the Constitution.
Most Americans operate under the assumption that federal judges enjoy lifetime tenure unless impeached.
However, Biggs points to Article III, Section 1, which states that judges serve "during good behavior."
This crucial provision, he argues, empowers Congress to remove judges who overstep their constitutional authority without needing a two-thirds majority in the Senate typically required for impeachment.
Biggs decries Boasberg's injunction that not only blocked the deportation of these alleged gang members but also ordered government planes to return to the U.S. after they had departed for El Salvador.
This action by Boasberg is seen as a direct affront to the Trump administration's efforts to safeguard national security and enforce immigration laws.
His ruling constitutes an overreach of judicial power that undermines the executive branch's constitutional prerogatives concerning foreign policy and national security.
Biggs emphasized the immense public support for ensuring that foreign threats, especially those posed by organized crime, are appropriately managed through lawful deportation practices.
“Boasberg knowingly interfered with the President’s execution of foreign policy,” Biggs declared, asserting that such bias could not only endanger public safety but also sets a dangerous precedent for future judicial actions.
In light of this grave situation, Biggs calls for a broader reevaluation of how the judicial system operates and its influence on Government policy.
He argues that Congress should have the authority to remove judges whose decisions clearly reflect a political bias or conflict of interest.
“We need to ensure that judges are held accountable for their actions when they step outside the bounds of their authority,” said Biggs.
This proposal could spark a significant shift in how Congress interacts with the judiciary, effectively challenging years of unimpeded judicial activism.
As lawmakers like Biggs take a stand against these judicial intrusions, the need for strong leadership in protecting the integrity of our immigration laws and securing the nation's borders becomes increasingly clear.
The future of national security and law and order rests in the balance as Congress considers this urgent matter.
Sources:
thegatewaypundit.com
thecentersquare.com
justthenews.com
In an alarming display of judicial overreach, a U.S. District judge has thwarted President Trump's lawful attempts to deport members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona is responding to this affront with a groundbreaking proposal to circumvent the traditional impeachment process.
In introducing new legislation, Biggs seeks to remove Judge James Boasberg, arguing that the judge has failed to maintain the "good behavior" standard required under the Constitution.
Most Americans operate under the assumption that federal judges enjoy lifetime tenure unless impeached.
However, Biggs points to Article III, Section 1, which states that judges serve "during good behavior."
This crucial provision, he argues, empowers Congress to remove judges who overstep their constitutional authority without needing a two-thirds majority in the Senate typically required for impeachment.
Biggs decries Boasberg's injunction that not only blocked the deportation of these alleged gang members but also ordered government planes to return to the U.S. after they had departed for El Salvador.
This action by Boasberg is seen as a direct affront to the Trump administration's efforts to safeguard national security and enforce immigration laws.
His ruling constitutes an overreach of judicial power that undermines the executive branch's constitutional prerogatives concerning foreign policy and national security.
Biggs emphasized the immense public support for ensuring that foreign threats, especially those posed by organized crime, are appropriately managed through lawful deportation practices.
“Boasberg knowingly interfered with the President’s execution of foreign policy,” Biggs declared, asserting that such bias could not only endanger public safety but also sets a dangerous precedent for future judicial actions.
In light of this grave situation, Biggs calls for a broader reevaluation of how the judicial system operates and its influence on Government policy.
He argues that Congress should have the authority to remove judges whose decisions clearly reflect a political bias or conflict of interest.
“We need to ensure that judges are held accountable for their actions when they step outside the bounds of their authority,” said Biggs.
This proposal could spark a significant shift in how Congress interacts with the judiciary, effectively challenging years of unimpeded judicial activism.
As lawmakers like Biggs take a stand against these judicial intrusions, the need for strong leadership in protecting the integrity of our immigration laws and securing the nation's borders becomes increasingly clear.
The future of national security and law and order rests in the balance as Congress considers this urgent matter.
Sources:
thegatewaypundit.com
thecentersquare.com
justthenews.com
Latest News