Left's Insidious Attack on Borders and Sovereignty
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 13 hours ago
**Reimagining Borders: A Radical Push Against National Sovereignty**
In a shocking display of academic radicalism, Georgetown Law Professor Sherally Munshi has labeled Donald Trump’s border enforcement policies as “ethically indefensible,” igniting outrage among conservatives who emphasize the importance of secure borders for national sovereignty.
Munshi's recent lecture, “Unsettling the Border,” reflects a growing trend in elite academic circles that seeks to undermine the very concept of borders.
Her assertion that borders are mere social constructs raises critical questions about the future of national sovereignty and security.
Historically, nations have maintained borders to ensure stability and safety within their territories, as established in treaties dating back centuries.
Yet, the radical left appears increasingly willing to dismiss these historical foundations in favor of a more open and undefined approach to immigration.
For Munshi, it seems that the millions of unvetted individuals crossing our southern border do not constitute a crisis; rather, she claims, it is a "crisis of imagination."
This perspective not only minimizes the serious implications of unregulated immigration but also insinuates that the desire for secure borders is rooted in racism and privilege.
Munshi's comments highlight a troubling trend in higher education, where conservative voices advocating for border enforcement have been systematically silenced.
With law faculties increasingly dominated by leftist ideologies, traditional values of national defense and sovereignty are often ridiculed and dismissed.
The danger of this approach is clear: by attacking the very notion of borders, proponents like Munshi are advocating for an abandonment of the basic tenets of nationhood and the rule of law.
The push for a more “inclusive” approach to border policy is not merely a political shift; it represents an existential challenge to the principles upon which the United States was founded.
The Trump administration’s focus on strong border enforcement and national security resonates with a significant portion of the American populace that recognizes the necessity of protecting American sovereignty.
As millions continue to cross the border illegally, the call for a “reimagining” of borders only serves to further endanger American citizens and undermine the rule of law.
Trump’s unwavering stance on border security stands in stark contrast to the radical left's dismissive ideology, reaffirming the importance of a nation that values its laws and the safety of its people.
In an era where the ideal of national sovereignty is under attack, it is crucial for conservatives to unite and advocate for policies that protect our borders, uphold the rule of law, and preserve the values that define America.
As the ongoing debate heats up, one thing is certain: the battle for the soul of our nation's borders is far from over.
Sources:
zerohedge.com
warroom.org
infowars.com
In a shocking display of academic radicalism, Georgetown Law Professor Sherally Munshi has labeled Donald Trump’s border enforcement policies as “ethically indefensible,” igniting outrage among conservatives who emphasize the importance of secure borders for national sovereignty.
Munshi's recent lecture, “Unsettling the Border,” reflects a growing trend in elite academic circles that seeks to undermine the very concept of borders.
Her assertion that borders are mere social constructs raises critical questions about the future of national sovereignty and security.
Historically, nations have maintained borders to ensure stability and safety within their territories, as established in treaties dating back centuries.
Yet, the radical left appears increasingly willing to dismiss these historical foundations in favor of a more open and undefined approach to immigration.
For Munshi, it seems that the millions of unvetted individuals crossing our southern border do not constitute a crisis; rather, she claims, it is a "crisis of imagination."
This perspective not only minimizes the serious implications of unregulated immigration but also insinuates that the desire for secure borders is rooted in racism and privilege.
Munshi's comments highlight a troubling trend in higher education, where conservative voices advocating for border enforcement have been systematically silenced.
With law faculties increasingly dominated by leftist ideologies, traditional values of national defense and sovereignty are often ridiculed and dismissed.
The danger of this approach is clear: by attacking the very notion of borders, proponents like Munshi are advocating for an abandonment of the basic tenets of nationhood and the rule of law.
The push for a more “inclusive” approach to border policy is not merely a political shift; it represents an existential challenge to the principles upon which the United States was founded.
The Trump administration’s focus on strong border enforcement and national security resonates with a significant portion of the American populace that recognizes the necessity of protecting American sovereignty.
As millions continue to cross the border illegally, the call for a “reimagining” of borders only serves to further endanger American citizens and undermine the rule of law.
Trump’s unwavering stance on border security stands in stark contrast to the radical left's dismissive ideology, reaffirming the importance of a nation that values its laws and the safety of its people.
In an era where the ideal of national sovereignty is under attack, it is crucial for conservatives to unite and advocate for policies that protect our borders, uphold the rule of law, and preserve the values that define America.
As the ongoing debate heats up, one thing is certain: the battle for the soul of our nation's borders is far from over.
Sources:
zerohedge.com
warroom.org
infowars.com
Latest News