Kansas Governor's Veto Threatens Children's Health and Safety
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 5 hours ago
**Dangerous Overreach: Democratic Governor Vetoes Bill to Protect Kansas Children**
Kansas Democratic Governor Laura Kelly has taken a controversial stand by vetoing a Republican-backed bill aimed at protecting children from controversial sex-change procedures.
In a move that has sparked outrage among many in the state, Kelly’s veto of Senate Bill 63 suggests she supports elective surgeries and pharmaceutical treatments for minors experiencing gender dysphoria.
The veto, characterized by Kelly as a defense of parental rights, raises questions about the role of government in medical decisions.
"Politicians should not stand between a parent and a child who needs medical care of any kind," she stated, despite the implications that such procedures could lead to long-lasting physical and psychological harm.
The bill, known as the Help Not Harm Act, is designed to prohibit health care providers from performing irreversible surgeries, such as elective mastectomies for girls and penis removals for boys.
It also aims to prevent the administration of puberty blockers—medications with serious side effects—on young people who may not be equipped to fully understand the ramifications of their choices.
The Kansas Legislature, dominated by Republicans, is poised to override Kelly’s veto, demonstrating a clear commitment to safeguarding the well-being of Kansas children.
With overwhelming support in both chambers—evidenced by a 32-8 vote in the Senate and an 83-35 vote in the House—the Republican leadership remains resolute in their mission.
House Republicans released a statement emphasizing that Kelly has chosen "partisan politics over the safety and well-being of our Kansas children."
They argue that lawmakers must prioritize the protection of vulnerable minors from potentially harmful medical interventions.
State Representative Dan Hawkins articulated the sentiment of many, asserting that children should not be subjected to life-altering decisions driven by ideological agendas.
Critics of the veto have underscored concerns about treating children as “medical laboratories” and emphasizing that proper guidance should come from informed adults, not ideologically driven policies.
Supporters of the Help Not Harm Act believe it should be common sense to protect children from irreversible changes that could affect their lives permanently.
As the state moves forward, it remains clear that the battle over safeguarding children’s health is far from over.
Republican leaders in Kansas are prepared to stand firm against any attempts to undermine this vital legislation, pushing for a future that prioritizes the health and safety of its youngest citizens.
Sources:
mrctv.org
theblaze.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Kansas Democratic Governor Laura Kelly has taken a controversial stand by vetoing a Republican-backed bill aimed at protecting children from controversial sex-change procedures.
In a move that has sparked outrage among many in the state, Kelly’s veto of Senate Bill 63 suggests she supports elective surgeries and pharmaceutical treatments for minors experiencing gender dysphoria.
The veto, characterized by Kelly as a defense of parental rights, raises questions about the role of government in medical decisions.
"Politicians should not stand between a parent and a child who needs medical care of any kind," she stated, despite the implications that such procedures could lead to long-lasting physical and psychological harm.
The bill, known as the Help Not Harm Act, is designed to prohibit health care providers from performing irreversible surgeries, such as elective mastectomies for girls and penis removals for boys.
It also aims to prevent the administration of puberty blockers—medications with serious side effects—on young people who may not be equipped to fully understand the ramifications of their choices.
The Kansas Legislature, dominated by Republicans, is poised to override Kelly’s veto, demonstrating a clear commitment to safeguarding the well-being of Kansas children.
With overwhelming support in both chambers—evidenced by a 32-8 vote in the Senate and an 83-35 vote in the House—the Republican leadership remains resolute in their mission.
House Republicans released a statement emphasizing that Kelly has chosen "partisan politics over the safety and well-being of our Kansas children."
They argue that lawmakers must prioritize the protection of vulnerable minors from potentially harmful medical interventions.
State Representative Dan Hawkins articulated the sentiment of many, asserting that children should not be subjected to life-altering decisions driven by ideological agendas.
Critics of the veto have underscored concerns about treating children as “medical laboratories” and emphasizing that proper guidance should come from informed adults, not ideologically driven policies.
Supporters of the Help Not Harm Act believe it should be common sense to protect children from irreversible changes that could affect their lives permanently.
As the state moves forward, it remains clear that the battle over safeguarding children’s health is far from over.
Republican leaders in Kansas are prepared to stand firm against any attempts to undermine this vital legislation, pushing for a future that prioritizes the health and safety of its youngest citizens.
Sources:
mrctv.org
theblaze.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Latest News