Farmers Forced to Battle Overreaching Methane Regulations
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 13 hours ago
**Exposing Climate Alarmism: Farmers Under Siege by Misguided Methane Regulations**
As the radical left continues its relentless crusade against fossil fuels, a new target has emerged: America’s farmers and their livestock.
Governments around the globe are imposing draconian regulations designed to address methane emissions, focusing scrutiny on cattle and other livestock.
This costly and disruptive agenda has sparked outrage among conservative circles, who contend that the science behind methane emissions is far less dire than portrayed.
A critical study published by the CO2 Coalition, authored by esteemed physicists William Happer and W. A. van Wijngaarden, challenges the prevailing climate narrative.
Their research indicates that methane's warming potential is grossly overstated and significantly less impactful than carbon dioxide.
Despite government's assertions that livestock emissions pose a substantial threat to global temperatures, the study highlights several troubling facts.
Methane concentrations are increasing at a rate 300 times slower than CO2, and its overall warming effect diminishes as atmospheric levels rise.
Furthermore, recent studies have pinpointed natural sources, particularly wetlands and agricultural practices, as primary contributors to rising methane levels, diverting blame from fossil fuel industries.
This contradicts the prevailing narrative that suggests a heavy-handed approach against fossil fuels will curb methane emissions.
In what should be seen as an affront to farmers, policies aimed at slashing methane output include the mandatory use of supplements like Bovaer, which some experts warn lacks sufficient safety studies.
Critics argue that these mandates not only jeopardize farmers’ livelihoods but could also increase food prices for families already facing inflation.
The left's climate agenda continues to unravel as more evidence emerges, proving that the war on methane is driven by a flawed understanding of the science involved.
It’s high time for policymakers to abandon these harmful regulations and support agricultural innovation instead.
Conservatives have long championed the rights of hardworking farmers, and the unfounded demonization of those who feed our country must be resisted.
Amid rising food costs and unclear regulations, it’s crucial to advocate for a balanced approach that protects both our environment and our farmers’ livelihoods.
Restoring common sense to the climate conversation can ensure food security while debunking the myths that have taken root in today's climate policy.
Sources:
americafirstreport.com
independentsentinel.com
breitbart.com
As the radical left continues its relentless crusade against fossil fuels, a new target has emerged: America’s farmers and their livestock.
Governments around the globe are imposing draconian regulations designed to address methane emissions, focusing scrutiny on cattle and other livestock.
This costly and disruptive agenda has sparked outrage among conservative circles, who contend that the science behind methane emissions is far less dire than portrayed.
A critical study published by the CO2 Coalition, authored by esteemed physicists William Happer and W. A. van Wijngaarden, challenges the prevailing climate narrative.
Their research indicates that methane's warming potential is grossly overstated and significantly less impactful than carbon dioxide.
Despite government's assertions that livestock emissions pose a substantial threat to global temperatures, the study highlights several troubling facts.
Methane concentrations are increasing at a rate 300 times slower than CO2, and its overall warming effect diminishes as atmospheric levels rise.
Furthermore, recent studies have pinpointed natural sources, particularly wetlands and agricultural practices, as primary contributors to rising methane levels, diverting blame from fossil fuel industries.
This contradicts the prevailing narrative that suggests a heavy-handed approach against fossil fuels will curb methane emissions.
In what should be seen as an affront to farmers, policies aimed at slashing methane output include the mandatory use of supplements like Bovaer, which some experts warn lacks sufficient safety studies.
Critics argue that these mandates not only jeopardize farmers’ livelihoods but could also increase food prices for families already facing inflation.
The left's climate agenda continues to unravel as more evidence emerges, proving that the war on methane is driven by a flawed understanding of the science involved.
It’s high time for policymakers to abandon these harmful regulations and support agricultural innovation instead.
Conservatives have long championed the rights of hardworking farmers, and the unfounded demonization of those who feed our country must be resisted.
Amid rising food costs and unclear regulations, it’s crucial to advocate for a balanced approach that protects both our environment and our farmers’ livelihoods.
Restoring common sense to the climate conversation can ensure food security while debunking the myths that have taken root in today's climate policy.
Sources:
americafirstreport.com
independentsentinel.com
breitbart.com
Latest News