**Outrageous Attempt at Political Censorship: Biden's ERA Move Is a Legal Sham**
In a move that many are calling a desperate and unconstitutional act, President Joe Biden has asserted that the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) has been ratified, despite the clear legal obstacles that have doomed this amendment for decades.
Just days away from a new administration that is likely to prioritize the rule of law, Biden's proclamation raises serious questions about his administration's commitment to constitutional integrity.
Originally passed in 1972, the ERA has languished in legislative limbo, failing to secure the necessary support from states, with only 35 out of the required 38 approving it by the 1982 deadline. The attempts to revive the ERA seem not only futile but also a blatant disregard for established legal processes.
Critics argue that this is merely an election-year ploy designed to cater to radical progressive factions. The primary beneficiaries of the ERA’s passage could ultimately be the abortion industry, which has long viewed the amendment as a pathway to enshrine abortion rights into the Constitution.
By asserting that the ERA is ratified, Biden seeks to elevate a controversial issue that could undermine existing legal protections for women. Legal experts are already voicing skepticism, noting that the ratification deadline is not merely a formality but a binding procedural requirement.
The National Archives, the body responsible for maintaining the integrity of the constitutional amendment process, has already stated that the ERA remains unratified, standing firm on prior rulings that emphasize adherence to the original framework established by Congress.
As many lawmakers prepare to contest Biden's overreach, former White House officials and legal scholars have denounced this maneuver as a "meaningless declaration."
Former White House Director of Strategic Communications Mercedes Schlapp cautioned that the ERA could unintentionally dismantle numerous existing laws aimed at protecting women, further instigating a legal and cultural battle that could undermine American values.
In a revealing comment, Kristen Waggoner, a leading figure from the Alliance Defending Freedom, highlighted Biden's actions as a "demonstration of continued contempt for the rule of law."
Moreover, the recent declaration of the ERA’s ratification has triggered widespread concern that it could lead to legal consequences ranging from the redefinition of "sex" in federal law to the endangerment of women's sports.
As the groundwork for a new administration develops, it is evident that Biden's push for the ERA serves not as a pathway to genuine equality, but rather as a vehicle for advancing a radical agenda that could have far-reaching implications for American society.
The next administration, framed by a commitment to uphold the Constitution, will likely pivot away from such unconstitutional antics, signaling a return to the foundational principles upon which this nation was built.
As Americans, it's crucial to remain vigilant against these attempts to erode our Constitution and to ensure that future governance aligns with the true spirit of democracy.
Sources:
rumble.comwnd.comendtimeheadlines.org