Biden's EPA Appeal Endangers Child Health and Safety
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Bureaucratic Overreach: Biden EPA's Last-Minute Appeal Threatens Public Health**
In a troubling development, the Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced plans to appeal a recent federal court ruling concerning water fluoridation—just days before the Trump administration takes office.
This move raises serious questions about the outgoing administration's commitment to public health, particularly as a federal judge determined that current fluoride levels in U.S. drinking water pose an unreasonable risk to children’s cognitive development.
The October ruling, which followed extensive scientific analysis, concluded that exposing American families to these fluoridated levels could potentially lead to reduced IQ in children. Despite this, the EPA opted to challenge the ruling, igniting concerns that it is more about maintaining the status quo than safeguarding public well-being.
Critics argue that the Biden administration is merely attempting to prolong outdated public health policies that many believe have long been in need of reevaluation. The move follows a pattern in which the EPA has been reluctant to acknowledge the harmful effects of fluoride, despite mounting evidence. Many in the health community have called for a halt to fluoridation practices, which are seen as relics of the past, especially when alternative, safer methods for dental care exist.
As Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Trump’s nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary, pointed out, the incoming Trump administration can swiftly reverse the EPA's decision—offering hope that the agency will shift its focus towards prioritizing American health and safety over bureaucratic inertia.
Moreover, with the new administration likely to take a fresh approach, the ruling could open the door to significant changes in public health policy that align with modern scientific understanding. Advocates for child health are calling this a pivotal moment—one that could align the U.S. with the vast majority of European nations that have already banned the addition of fluoride in drinking water.
In a time of unprecedented concern for children's well-being, it is crucial that regulatory bodies do not stand in the way of science and evidence-based decisions. The outgoing administration's final acts raise compelling questions about its agenda.
As the new administration prepares to take the reins, all eyes will be on how they handle this pressing public health issue, with the hope that they act quickly to protect the health of millions of American families. The January 20 transition marks a critical opportunity to champion a future free from unnecessary risks associated with water fluoridation.
Sources:
100percentfedup.com
thesurvivalmom.com
justthenews.com
In a troubling development, the Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced plans to appeal a recent federal court ruling concerning water fluoridation—just days before the Trump administration takes office.
This move raises serious questions about the outgoing administration's commitment to public health, particularly as a federal judge determined that current fluoride levels in U.S. drinking water pose an unreasonable risk to children’s cognitive development.
The October ruling, which followed extensive scientific analysis, concluded that exposing American families to these fluoridated levels could potentially lead to reduced IQ in children. Despite this, the EPA opted to challenge the ruling, igniting concerns that it is more about maintaining the status quo than safeguarding public well-being.
Critics argue that the Biden administration is merely attempting to prolong outdated public health policies that many believe have long been in need of reevaluation. The move follows a pattern in which the EPA has been reluctant to acknowledge the harmful effects of fluoride, despite mounting evidence. Many in the health community have called for a halt to fluoridation practices, which are seen as relics of the past, especially when alternative, safer methods for dental care exist.
As Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Trump’s nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary, pointed out, the incoming Trump administration can swiftly reverse the EPA's decision—offering hope that the agency will shift its focus towards prioritizing American health and safety over bureaucratic inertia.
Moreover, with the new administration likely to take a fresh approach, the ruling could open the door to significant changes in public health policy that align with modern scientific understanding. Advocates for child health are calling this a pivotal moment—one that could align the U.S. with the vast majority of European nations that have already banned the addition of fluoride in drinking water.
In a time of unprecedented concern for children's well-being, it is crucial that regulatory bodies do not stand in the way of science and evidence-based decisions. The outgoing administration's final acts raise compelling questions about its agenda.
As the new administration prepares to take the reins, all eyes will be on how they handle this pressing public health issue, with the hope that they act quickly to protect the health of millions of American families. The January 20 transition marks a critical opportunity to champion a future free from unnecessary risks associated with water fluoridation.
Sources:
100percentfedup.com
thesurvivalmom.com
justthenews.com
Latest News