Trump's Warning: Hidden Costs of Wind Power Revealed
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Exposed: The Hidden Costs of Wind Power That Prove Trump Right**
In a stunning revelation, energy experts have affirmed former President Donald Trump's assertions regarding the wind power industry, underscoring what many have described as "hidden costs" of renewable energy.
At a recent press conference at Mar-a-Lago, Trump remarked that wind energy resembles “dropping garbage in a field” and pointed out the incredible riches being amassed by wind developers, significantly funded by government subsidies.
His criticisms aren't without merit. An analysis from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory shows a concerning trend: from 2019 to 2023, average retail electricity prices in the United States have risen in line with inflation, while certain states like California—heavily invested in renewable energy—have seen rates skyrocket by over 8%.
Despite media narratives claiming wind power is a low-cost solution, the reality is markedly different. Traditional energy sources such as natural gas remain more affordable, with estimates by energy experts revealing that onshore wind electricity costs approximately $240 per megawatt-hour compared to just $98 for natural gas.
Critics point out that mainstream media often overlooks these figures, instead relying on the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) metric—a composition that fails to account for the significant expenses associated with integrating intermittent sources like wind into the national grid.
Experts Robert Bryce and Isaac Orr have confirmed that the purported economic advantage of wind energy vanishes once you consider factors like the need for transmission lines, battery storage, and the overbuilding of capacity to manage fluctuating energy supply from wind farms.
Trump's arguments not only expose the inaccuracies in pro-renewable energy narratives but also call into question the immense federal taxpayer support required to sustain the wind industry. Despite claims from the Biden administration and others that wind power is economically viable, the persistent need for taxpayer funding suggests a different truth entirely.
With subsidies for wind and solar energy purportedly having risen 21-fold since 2017, it raises a critical point: why are we continuing to pour taxpayer dollars into a failing energy model when traditional sources have consistently proven to be more reliable and cost-effective?
As the nation moves forward, it's evident that the conversation around energy must shift towards fiscal responsibility and practical solutions, not just the latest buzzwords lauding renewable energy. The growing evidence that supports Trump's skepticism of the wind power industry presents a valuable opportunity to reassess America’s energy strategies and prioritize the interests of hardworking taxpayers.
Sources:
justthenews.com
wentworthreport.com
rumble.com
In a stunning revelation, energy experts have affirmed former President Donald Trump's assertions regarding the wind power industry, underscoring what many have described as "hidden costs" of renewable energy.
At a recent press conference at Mar-a-Lago, Trump remarked that wind energy resembles “dropping garbage in a field” and pointed out the incredible riches being amassed by wind developers, significantly funded by government subsidies.
His criticisms aren't without merit. An analysis from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory shows a concerning trend: from 2019 to 2023, average retail electricity prices in the United States have risen in line with inflation, while certain states like California—heavily invested in renewable energy—have seen rates skyrocket by over 8%.
Despite media narratives claiming wind power is a low-cost solution, the reality is markedly different. Traditional energy sources such as natural gas remain more affordable, with estimates by energy experts revealing that onshore wind electricity costs approximately $240 per megawatt-hour compared to just $98 for natural gas.
Critics point out that mainstream media often overlooks these figures, instead relying on the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) metric—a composition that fails to account for the significant expenses associated with integrating intermittent sources like wind into the national grid.
Experts Robert Bryce and Isaac Orr have confirmed that the purported economic advantage of wind energy vanishes once you consider factors like the need for transmission lines, battery storage, and the overbuilding of capacity to manage fluctuating energy supply from wind farms.
Trump's arguments not only expose the inaccuracies in pro-renewable energy narratives but also call into question the immense federal taxpayer support required to sustain the wind industry. Despite claims from the Biden administration and others that wind power is economically viable, the persistent need for taxpayer funding suggests a different truth entirely.
With subsidies for wind and solar energy purportedly having risen 21-fold since 2017, it raises a critical point: why are we continuing to pour taxpayer dollars into a failing energy model when traditional sources have consistently proven to be more reliable and cost-effective?
As the nation moves forward, it's evident that the conversation around energy must shift towards fiscal responsibility and practical solutions, not just the latest buzzwords lauding renewable energy. The growing evidence that supports Trump's skepticism of the wind power industry presents a valuable opportunity to reassess America’s energy strategies and prioritize the interests of hardworking taxpayers.
Sources:
justthenews.com
wentworthreport.com
rumble.com
Latest News