COVID Vaccine Efficacy Questioned by Top Experts' Findings
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
The validity of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy has been brought into question by recent findings from top experts, casting doubt on claims that millions of lives were saved through mass vaccination efforts.
In an alarming review by researchers from the UK's Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, the narrative that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were instrumental in saving lives has been thoroughly debunked.
Professor Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson scrutinized widely cited claims that the vaccines saved upwards of 12 million lives and found them to be based on flawed modeling and assumptions.
The initial assertions, propagated by various media outlets including the BBC and a disease forecasting company, never underwent rigorous examination or validation.
Heneghan and Jefferson highlighted that many journalists fail to confirm the accuracy of the numbers presented, leading to widespread dissemination of misleading information.
The researchers noted that the assumptions used in these models are implausible, raising serious questions about their validity.
They reminded the public that reliable data from large, well-constructed clinical trials should be the basis for public health decisions, not speculative models.
Compounding the issue, recent data from the UK government reveals concerning trends among vaccinated populations.
Statistics indicate that between January and May 2023, approximately 95% of COVID-19 deaths occurred among those who had received the vaccine.
This counterintuitive outcome raises critical concerns regarding the ongoing promotion of the booster shots.
As the debate over vaccine safety and efficacy intensifies, the findings from Heneghan and Jefferson serve as a clarion call for increased transparency and accountability in health communications.
In light of this new evidence, a growing number of health professionals and citizens alike are calling for a reevaluation of current vaccination strategies, suggesting that the focus should shift to informed choice rather than blanket mandates.
The ramifications of this study could shape the future discourse around public health policies and vaccine distribution, highlighting the essential need for accurate and unbiased information in healthcare decisions.
Sources:
thepostmillennial.com
slaynews.com
slaynews.com
In an alarming review by researchers from the UK's Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, the narrative that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were instrumental in saving lives has been thoroughly debunked.
Professor Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson scrutinized widely cited claims that the vaccines saved upwards of 12 million lives and found them to be based on flawed modeling and assumptions.
The initial assertions, propagated by various media outlets including the BBC and a disease forecasting company, never underwent rigorous examination or validation.
Heneghan and Jefferson highlighted that many journalists fail to confirm the accuracy of the numbers presented, leading to widespread dissemination of misleading information.
The researchers noted that the assumptions used in these models are implausible, raising serious questions about their validity.
They reminded the public that reliable data from large, well-constructed clinical trials should be the basis for public health decisions, not speculative models.
Compounding the issue, recent data from the UK government reveals concerning trends among vaccinated populations.
Statistics indicate that between January and May 2023, approximately 95% of COVID-19 deaths occurred among those who had received the vaccine.
This counterintuitive outcome raises critical concerns regarding the ongoing promotion of the booster shots.
As the debate over vaccine safety and efficacy intensifies, the findings from Heneghan and Jefferson serve as a clarion call for increased transparency and accountability in health communications.
In light of this new evidence, a growing number of health professionals and citizens alike are calling for a reevaluation of current vaccination strategies, suggesting that the focus should shift to informed choice rather than blanket mandates.
The ramifications of this study could shape the future discourse around public health policies and vaccine distribution, highlighting the essential need for accurate and unbiased information in healthcare decisions.
Sources:
thepostmillennial.com
slaynews.com
slaynews.com
Latest News