Meta Censors Pro-Life Voices, Silences Free Speech
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 5 hours ago
Censorship
In a troubling display of censorship, social media giant Meta has suspended pro-life news site LifeNews and its CEO, Steven Ertelt, along with a potential adoptive mother for promoting a video that highlights the humanity of unborn children.
This move raises serious questions about the integrity of Meta’s content moderation practices and its commitment to free speech, especially when individuals can be penalized for sharing life-affirming content.
According to a letter from the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), Ertelt's accounts were locked shortly after he shared a medically informative video depicting a cesarean section, captioned, "An unborn baby can’t be just a clump of cells when he or she is grabbing the doctor’s hand."
Far from demonstrating child exploitation, this post aimed to dispel harmful misconceptions about unborn life.
Yet, Meta's moderation team, which reportedly struggles with significant flaws, responded by categorizing the content as violating its standards against "human exploitation," an assessment many see as alarmingly misguided.
Ernelt expressed his outrage over this suspension, asserting that censoring a pro-life video as “child sexual exploitation” not only misrepresents the content but also diminishes the fight for the rights of the unborn.
He pointed out that while Meta pledges to uphold free speech on its platforms, this incident showcases a disconnect between their promises and the actions taken against users who advocate for pro-life beliefs.
In addition to the LifeNews chief, Abby Covington, who eloquently chronicled her family’s adoption journey on her social media, also faced suspension for promoting similar life-affirming ideals.
As a small business owner, Covington utilized her platform to reach mothers considering adoption, illustrating the powerful narrative of life that many in the pro-choice camp often attempt to silence.
The implications of Meta’s recent actions extend beyond mere suspensions; they reflect a broader trend of suppressing narratives that don’t align with the progressive agenda, particularly on issues surrounding life and family.
Both Ertelt and Covington have engaged in family-friendly, life-affirming discussions, yet their accounts were silenced after reporting misuse of their professional endeavors.
They aimed to foster a culture that recognizes the dignity and worth of every human life, regardless of its stage.
As the pro-life movement continues to gain momentum, these restrictions on platforms like Facebook and Instagram highlight a growing concern over the essential freedoms of expression and the right to advocate for such values.
For many, the stakes are high as they navigate a landscape where their voice rests precariously against the whims of social media giants.
The unfolding situation serves as a call to action for those who value free speech and wish to see all perspectives represented in public discourse.
Censorship should not be tolerated, especially when it attempts to quash the conversation surrounding the intrinsic value of every human life.
Sources:
globalresearch.ca
lifenews.com
lifenews.com
In a troubling display of censorship, social media giant Meta has suspended pro-life news site LifeNews and its CEO, Steven Ertelt, along with a potential adoptive mother for promoting a video that highlights the humanity of unborn children.
This move raises serious questions about the integrity of Meta’s content moderation practices and its commitment to free speech, especially when individuals can be penalized for sharing life-affirming content.
According to a letter from the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), Ertelt's accounts were locked shortly after he shared a medically informative video depicting a cesarean section, captioned, "An unborn baby can’t be just a clump of cells when he or she is grabbing the doctor’s hand."
Far from demonstrating child exploitation, this post aimed to dispel harmful misconceptions about unborn life.
Yet, Meta's moderation team, which reportedly struggles with significant flaws, responded by categorizing the content as violating its standards against "human exploitation," an assessment many see as alarmingly misguided.
Ernelt expressed his outrage over this suspension, asserting that censoring a pro-life video as “child sexual exploitation” not only misrepresents the content but also diminishes the fight for the rights of the unborn.
He pointed out that while Meta pledges to uphold free speech on its platforms, this incident showcases a disconnect between their promises and the actions taken against users who advocate for pro-life beliefs.
In addition to the LifeNews chief, Abby Covington, who eloquently chronicled her family’s adoption journey on her social media, also faced suspension for promoting similar life-affirming ideals.
As a small business owner, Covington utilized her platform to reach mothers considering adoption, illustrating the powerful narrative of life that many in the pro-choice camp often attempt to silence.
The implications of Meta’s recent actions extend beyond mere suspensions; they reflect a broader trend of suppressing narratives that don’t align with the progressive agenda, particularly on issues surrounding life and family.
Both Ertelt and Covington have engaged in family-friendly, life-affirming discussions, yet their accounts were silenced after reporting misuse of their professional endeavors.
They aimed to foster a culture that recognizes the dignity and worth of every human life, regardless of its stage.
As the pro-life movement continues to gain momentum, these restrictions on platforms like Facebook and Instagram highlight a growing concern over the essential freedoms of expression and the right to advocate for such values.
For many, the stakes are high as they navigate a landscape where their voice rests precariously against the whims of social media giants.
The unfolding situation serves as a call to action for those who value free speech and wish to see all perspectives represented in public discourse.
Censorship should not be tolerated, especially when it attempts to quash the conversation surrounding the intrinsic value of every human life.
Sources:
globalresearch.ca
lifenews.com
lifenews.com
Latest News