Trump Allies Fight Back Against Political Persecution Report
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 1 day ago
**Injustice Reigns: Trump Allies Establish Legal Battle Against Disgraceful Special Counsel Report**
In a bold move indicative of the ongoing struggles against perceived political persecution, two co-defendants of former President Donald Trump are mounting a fierce legal challenge against Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira filed an emergency motion in a Florida federal court, seeking to prevent the release of Smith's upcoming report tied to dismissed charges over classified documents.
The defendants claim that Smith's report would violate court orders, infringe upon their constitutional rights, and unduly influence any potential future proceedings against them.
Their legal team argues that the Special Counsel's report is tainted by both unconstitutional conduct and one-sided narratives that leverage sensitive grand jury materials unfairly.
"This Final Report promises to be a one-sided, slanted report," asserted the defense.
They contend it is crafted to manipulate public perception rather than offer a fair representation of events.
Key to their argument is the assertion that Jack Smith's appointment as Special Counsel was ruled unconstitutional by a federal court, questioning the legitimacy of any findings he seeks to publish.
Moreover, the defense argues the timing of the report's release could seriously jeopardize their right to a fair trial, since legal appeals are still pending and Smith's prior conduct has raised concerns about adherence to judicial protocols.
This challenge comes on the heels of a wider pattern of perceived overreach by the Biden administration, as many view these legal maneuvers as an attempt to undermine Trump and his associates at all costs.
As Attorney General Merrick Garland and the DOJ navigate these rocky waters, the implications of Smith's report threaten to extend beyond just this case, potentially entangling DOJ officials in violations of grand jury secrecy rules.
The matter is crucial not only for Nauta and De Oliveira but for the integrity of the judicial process as a whole.
Americans are left to ponder: How much longer will fairness and justice remain compromised in the face of politically motivated prosecutions?
The defendants are asking the court to issue an injunction to halt the release of Smith’s report which they believe will cause "irreparable harm" to their cases and their reputations.
A hearing on this urgent matter is anticipated soon, and it may have profound ramifications on both Trump’s legacy and the political landscape ahead of the upcoming presidential election.
As the battle unfolds, one thing remains clear: the fight for justice is far from over.
Sources:
100percentfedup.com
nbcnews.com
redstate.com
In a bold move indicative of the ongoing struggles against perceived political persecution, two co-defendants of former President Donald Trump are mounting a fierce legal challenge against Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira filed an emergency motion in a Florida federal court, seeking to prevent the release of Smith's upcoming report tied to dismissed charges over classified documents.
The defendants claim that Smith's report would violate court orders, infringe upon their constitutional rights, and unduly influence any potential future proceedings against them.
Their legal team argues that the Special Counsel's report is tainted by both unconstitutional conduct and one-sided narratives that leverage sensitive grand jury materials unfairly.
"This Final Report promises to be a one-sided, slanted report," asserted the defense.
They contend it is crafted to manipulate public perception rather than offer a fair representation of events.
Key to their argument is the assertion that Jack Smith's appointment as Special Counsel was ruled unconstitutional by a federal court, questioning the legitimacy of any findings he seeks to publish.
Moreover, the defense argues the timing of the report's release could seriously jeopardize their right to a fair trial, since legal appeals are still pending and Smith's prior conduct has raised concerns about adherence to judicial protocols.
This challenge comes on the heels of a wider pattern of perceived overreach by the Biden administration, as many view these legal maneuvers as an attempt to undermine Trump and his associates at all costs.
As Attorney General Merrick Garland and the DOJ navigate these rocky waters, the implications of Smith's report threaten to extend beyond just this case, potentially entangling DOJ officials in violations of grand jury secrecy rules.
The matter is crucial not only for Nauta and De Oliveira but for the integrity of the judicial process as a whole.
Americans are left to ponder: How much longer will fairness and justice remain compromised in the face of politically motivated prosecutions?
The defendants are asking the court to issue an injunction to halt the release of Smith’s report which they believe will cause "irreparable harm" to their cases and their reputations.
A hearing on this urgent matter is anticipated soon, and it may have profound ramifications on both Trump’s legacy and the political landscape ahead of the upcoming presidential election.
As the battle unfolds, one thing remains clear: the fight for justice is far from over.
Sources:
100percentfedup.com
nbcnews.com
redstate.com
Latest News