Biden Administration's Censorship Tactics Are Exposed
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 1 day ago
Censorship
Unraveling government deception, new court documents reveal that the Biden administration has been actively involved in censoring dissenting opinions, particularly surrounding COVID-19, since the outset of the pandemic.
These revelations come from filings in the Missouri v. Biden case, which highlight alarming evidence that government officials have manipulated information and coerced social media platforms to silence voices critical of their policies.
The discovery suggests that government censorship efforts began in February 2020, contradicting claims made by the Department of Homeland Security that they started later.
In fact, it has been uncovered that officials from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) engaged in blatant disregard for transparency laws, manipulating public records to conceal their controversial actions.
One particularly troubling account reveals that Andy Slavitt, a senior adviser to President Biden and a figure from the Obama administration, pressured Twitter to ban journalist Alex Berenson over his skepticism regarding mRNA vaccines.
The Missouri plaintiffs, which include states and high-profile medical experts, are demanding further disclosure and more depositions, citing a consistent pattern of misconduct by federal employees.
Throughout the discovery process, questions have arisen about the integrity of public health information distributed during the pandemic, as officials, including Anthony Fauci, have repeatedly claimed a lack of recollection concerning critical decisions.
The plaintiffs also assert that the censorship tactics employed by federal agencies not only targeted individual posts but were part of a broader strategy to suppress free speech on contentious public health debates.
Alarmingly, a significant portion of American society has lost trust in the federal government, with only 17% believing that it typically acts in the public's best interest. This skepticism appears well-founded when considering the recent pattern of misinformation and manipulation by federal agencies.
In a landscape increasingly defined by “Big Tech” and the governmental partnership in censoring public discourse, the need for accountability has never been more pressing.
With Republicans now poised to investigate these overreaches in the 118th Congress, there is hope that appropriate measures can be taken to restore transparency and protect the fundamental right of free speech for all Americans.
As more information continues to emerge, the Republican commitment to tirelessly working against government overreach and censorship should unify conservative voices across the nation.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
trialsitenews.com
reclaimthenet.org
Unraveling government deception, new court documents reveal that the Biden administration has been actively involved in censoring dissenting opinions, particularly surrounding COVID-19, since the outset of the pandemic.
These revelations come from filings in the Missouri v. Biden case, which highlight alarming evidence that government officials have manipulated information and coerced social media platforms to silence voices critical of their policies.
The discovery suggests that government censorship efforts began in February 2020, contradicting claims made by the Department of Homeland Security that they started later.
In fact, it has been uncovered that officials from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) engaged in blatant disregard for transparency laws, manipulating public records to conceal their controversial actions.
One particularly troubling account reveals that Andy Slavitt, a senior adviser to President Biden and a figure from the Obama administration, pressured Twitter to ban journalist Alex Berenson over his skepticism regarding mRNA vaccines.
The Missouri plaintiffs, which include states and high-profile medical experts, are demanding further disclosure and more depositions, citing a consistent pattern of misconduct by federal employees.
Throughout the discovery process, questions have arisen about the integrity of public health information distributed during the pandemic, as officials, including Anthony Fauci, have repeatedly claimed a lack of recollection concerning critical decisions.
The plaintiffs also assert that the censorship tactics employed by federal agencies not only targeted individual posts but were part of a broader strategy to suppress free speech on contentious public health debates.
Alarmingly, a significant portion of American society has lost trust in the federal government, with only 17% believing that it typically acts in the public's best interest. This skepticism appears well-founded when considering the recent pattern of misinformation and manipulation by federal agencies.
In a landscape increasingly defined by “Big Tech” and the governmental partnership in censoring public discourse, the need for accountability has never been more pressing.
With Republicans now poised to investigate these overreaches in the 118th Congress, there is hope that appropriate measures can be taken to restore transparency and protect the fundamental right of free speech for all Americans.
As more information continues to emerge, the Republican commitment to tirelessly working against government overreach and censorship should unify conservative voices across the nation.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
trialsitenews.com
reclaimthenet.org
Latest News