Rushed mRNA Bird Flu Vaccine Sparks Safety Concerns
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 days ago
**Disaster Waiting to Happen: The Push for an Untested mRNA Bird Flu Vaccine**
In a concerning development, health authorities are rushing to introduce an untested mRNA “vaccine” for the Bird Flu, a move that raises serious alarms about safety and accountability.
Recent discussions led by health “experts” on mainstream media channels like CNN have highlighted calls for immediate testing of this new vaccine.
The irony is hard to ignore: the same individuals who championed the COVID vaccine rollout without proper scrutiny are now pushing for yet another hastily developed product for a disease that has shown almost no evidence of spreading between humans.
Critics argue the vaccine is a "non-vaccine," referring to its potential dangers as it may foster evolutionary changes in pathogens rather than curtailing them.
The term "leaky vaccine" describes a product that may not provide the necessary immunity and could potentially increase the uptake required to prevent an outbreak.
This situation is compounded by the fact that there have been no recorded human-to-human transmissions of the current Bird Flu variant, raising questions about the urgency of this vaccine rollout.
The pharmaceutical companies involved are racing to secure an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), a move that could spare them from liability should complications arise.
For those wary of government mandates—which have been all too common in recent years—this latest push serves as a red flag.
It calls into question whether we will once again see the likes of California Governor Gavin Newsom stepping in to impose vaccination laws on an unsuspecting public.
Furthermore, experts have voiced concerns over reliance on flawed testing methods that seem designed more for sales than for the protection of public health.
Public trust has already been compromised by past vaccine debacles; can the public afford to take the risk again?
Advocates for caution emphasize the importance of scrutiny when it comes to vaccine safety, particularly as we recall the adverse effects linked to vaccine programs from the past.
As we grapple with these issues, it becomes clear that the best approach remains one rooted in thorough investigation and transparency—qualities that seem sorely lacking in today’s rushed healthcare landscape.
Ultimately, it is crucial for Americans to stay vigilant and require proper assurances before accepting another government-sanctioned vaccination initiative that lacks accountability.
Sources:
independentsentinel.com
kirschsubstack.com
yahoo.com
In a concerning development, health authorities are rushing to introduce an untested mRNA “vaccine” for the Bird Flu, a move that raises serious alarms about safety and accountability.
Recent discussions led by health “experts” on mainstream media channels like CNN have highlighted calls for immediate testing of this new vaccine.
The irony is hard to ignore: the same individuals who championed the COVID vaccine rollout without proper scrutiny are now pushing for yet another hastily developed product for a disease that has shown almost no evidence of spreading between humans.
Critics argue the vaccine is a "non-vaccine," referring to its potential dangers as it may foster evolutionary changes in pathogens rather than curtailing them.
The term "leaky vaccine" describes a product that may not provide the necessary immunity and could potentially increase the uptake required to prevent an outbreak.
This situation is compounded by the fact that there have been no recorded human-to-human transmissions of the current Bird Flu variant, raising questions about the urgency of this vaccine rollout.
The pharmaceutical companies involved are racing to secure an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), a move that could spare them from liability should complications arise.
For those wary of government mandates—which have been all too common in recent years—this latest push serves as a red flag.
It calls into question whether we will once again see the likes of California Governor Gavin Newsom stepping in to impose vaccination laws on an unsuspecting public.
Furthermore, experts have voiced concerns over reliance on flawed testing methods that seem designed more for sales than for the protection of public health.
Public trust has already been compromised by past vaccine debacles; can the public afford to take the risk again?
Advocates for caution emphasize the importance of scrutiny when it comes to vaccine safety, particularly as we recall the adverse effects linked to vaccine programs from the past.
As we grapple with these issues, it becomes clear that the best approach remains one rooted in thorough investigation and transparency—qualities that seem sorely lacking in today’s rushed healthcare landscape.
Ultimately, it is crucial for Americans to stay vigilant and require proper assurances before accepting another government-sanctioned vaccination initiative that lacks accountability.
Sources:
independentsentinel.com
kirschsubstack.com
yahoo.com
Latest News