University of Michigan Profits from Controversial Pronoun Training
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 12 hours ago
**Profiteering from Pronouns: The University of Michigan's 'Pronouns 101' Training Fee Exposed**
In a move that has raised eyebrows across the nation, the University of Michigan is charging K-12 public schools a staggering $600 for a two-hour training called "Pronouns 101."
This program, aimed at teaching the use of various pronouns, exemplifies a troubling trend where educational institutions impose hefty fees for what many see as politically charged ideology.
The University of Michigan's Spectrum Center, which promotes LGBTQIA2S+ inclusivity, is ostensibly providing these training sessions to foster understanding and combat discrimination.
However, critics argue that charging public schools for such programs is not only exploitative but also reflects a broader agenda to integrate progressive viewpoints into educational curriculums at a time when many Americans are concerned about the direction of public education.
The course outline indicates a focus on the significance of pronouns, skills for bystander intervention, and creating inclusive environments.
Despite the lofty goals of promoting inclusivity, the exorbitant fee raises questions about the sincerity of these initiatives.
Could the fees drive schools to allocate funds away from essential resources, prioritizing ideology over academics?
In addition to "Pronouns 101," the University also offers a six-hour course titled “Towards Solidarity: Allyship in Action” for an eye-popping price of $1,800.
These trainings seem poised to turn education into a marketplace for ideological conformity, much to the dismay of parents and concerned citizens advocating for transparency, accountability, and a focus on core academic subjects.
As parents and taxpayers grapple with rising education costs and a myriad of social issues infiltrating schools, the appropriateness of such programs—and their price tags—merit serious reconsideration.
Despite claims of creating a more inclusive society, many believe that this approach risks alienating those who question such ideologies, ultimately dividing communities rather than fostering understanding.
It remains to be seen how this trend will play out in the broader educational landscape, but with increasing scrutiny, people are demanding more balance and inclusion in what is taught to their children.
Sources:
rumble.com
eff.org
campusreform.org
In a move that has raised eyebrows across the nation, the University of Michigan is charging K-12 public schools a staggering $600 for a two-hour training called "Pronouns 101."
This program, aimed at teaching the use of various pronouns, exemplifies a troubling trend where educational institutions impose hefty fees for what many see as politically charged ideology.
The University of Michigan's Spectrum Center, which promotes LGBTQIA2S+ inclusivity, is ostensibly providing these training sessions to foster understanding and combat discrimination.
However, critics argue that charging public schools for such programs is not only exploitative but also reflects a broader agenda to integrate progressive viewpoints into educational curriculums at a time when many Americans are concerned about the direction of public education.
The course outline indicates a focus on the significance of pronouns, skills for bystander intervention, and creating inclusive environments.
Despite the lofty goals of promoting inclusivity, the exorbitant fee raises questions about the sincerity of these initiatives.
Could the fees drive schools to allocate funds away from essential resources, prioritizing ideology over academics?
In addition to "Pronouns 101," the University also offers a six-hour course titled “Towards Solidarity: Allyship in Action” for an eye-popping price of $1,800.
These trainings seem poised to turn education into a marketplace for ideological conformity, much to the dismay of parents and concerned citizens advocating for transparency, accountability, and a focus on core academic subjects.
As parents and taxpayers grapple with rising education costs and a myriad of social issues infiltrating schools, the appropriateness of such programs—and their price tags—merit serious reconsideration.
Despite claims of creating a more inclusive society, many believe that this approach risks alienating those who question such ideologies, ultimately dividing communities rather than fostering understanding.
It remains to be seen how this trend will play out in the broader educational landscape, but with increasing scrutiny, people are demanding more balance and inclusion in what is taught to their children.
Sources:
rumble.com
eff.org
campusreform.org
Latest News