New Report Challenges January 6 Narrative Against Trump

Submitted by MAGA

Posted 4 hours ago

The recently released report on the January 6 Capitol incident has ignited a firestorm of discussion surrounding former President Donald Trump's role in the events of that fateful day.

For years, a narrative pushed by Democrats and the mainstream media depicted Trump as the architect of the chaos that unfolded in Washington D.C.

However, the findings of this new report challenge that narrative dramatically.

Conducted by the House Administration Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight, the report indicates that Trump's acting defense secretary, Christopher Miller, actively ignored direct orders from the President to provide military assistance to ensure the Capitol's security on January 6, 2021.


According to interviews from the Department of Defense Inspector General, Trump's directive was clear.

At a meeting ahead of the certification of the 2020 election results, Trump urged military preparedness, stating, "Hey, I don’t care if you use Guard, or soldiers, active-duty soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it’s safe."

Instead of heeding this order, Miller reportedly dismissed Trump’s instructions as mere "banter," a decision that resulted in a security void during the Capitol incursion.

The ramifications of Miller’s refusal have now come to light, revealing how internal dissent within the military leadership may have directly contributed to the chaos of that day.

Additionally, the report highlights the influence of individuals such as former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, who was part of the bipartisan committee investigating the events of January 6.

Cheney's coalition with established anti-Trump figures, including former defense secretaries, worked to undermine military readiness at a critical moment.

Miller's hesitancy appears to have been fueled by fears of public perception and accusations of being a "Trump crony," rather than prioritizing national security.

As former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley articulated during the inquiry, there was a climate of intense criticism and fear surrounding any actions perceived as supporting Trump.

This revelation raises essential questions about accountability within the military apparatus during one of the most politically charged moments in recent history.

The consequences of these actions extend beyond January 6 alone, challenging the narrative of Trump’s culpability while putting a spotlight on those who failed to act when they were needed the most.

As Trump's political resurgence looms ahead, this report serves as a clarion call for supporters and critics alike to reassess what truly took place on that day.

The findings demand a reflection on leadership, responsibility, and the often-ignored complexities of the events that have shaped the nation’s current political landscape.

With the upcoming certification of Trump's victory in the next election cycle anticipated, the implications of this report will undoubtedly continue to resonate throughout the political arena.

Sources:
westernjournal.com
infowars.com
thegatewaypundit.com












Latest News