CDC Study Reveals COVID Vaccine Risks for Children
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
A shocking revelation from a recent CDC-funded study reveals that COVID-19 vaccines may have had unintended consequences for children, raising serious questions about the public health policies pushed by the government.
The findings show a stark reality: some vaccinated children are reportedly more likely to contract COVID-19 compared to their unvaccinated peers.
This study published on the Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society website analyzed several cohorts to assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among children aged six months to four years.
What they uncovered was a startling lack of efficacy for the vaccines in preventing infection.
In fact, the study found that children who had received the Pfizer vaccine were more likely to experience symptomatic COVID-19 than those who remained unvaccinated.
Such revelations have sparked widespread concerns among parents and stakeholders about the recommendations being made by health authorities, like the CDC.
The implication of these findings is profound and challenges the narrative that has dominated public health discussions for nearly four years.
Parents trusted officials when they advocated for vaccine mandates, often without considering natural immunity, which the study indicates provides better protection against COVID-19.
This contrasts sharply with the government's push for vaccination, which continues to ignore the growing body of evidence surrounding the effectiveness of natural immunity.
Critics argue that the failure to address these findings openly underlines a troubling trend where public health decisions appear influenced by agendas rather than the best interests of children.
Given the background that many nations chose not to vaccinate children at all, it raises a crucial question: Why were U.S. health authorities so quick to impose vaccines on this vulnerable population?
As trust in medical authorities reaches an all-time low, many are calling for a comprehensive review of public health policies and demanding accountability from those who led the push for vaccinations under dubious premises.
The study serves as a clarion call, urging parents to reconsider the implications of vaccine mandates and the overarching influence of bureaucratic agencies in their children's health decisions.
Amidst these revelations, it is essential to foster open discussions about vaccine safety, effectiveness, and the trustworthiness of expert guidance moving forward.
On this matter, parents deserve clarity, transparency, and choices based on factual evidence—not political pressure or fear tactics.
Sources:
lifenews.com
outkick.com
outkick.com
The findings show a stark reality: some vaccinated children are reportedly more likely to contract COVID-19 compared to their unvaccinated peers.
This study published on the Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society website analyzed several cohorts to assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among children aged six months to four years.
What they uncovered was a startling lack of efficacy for the vaccines in preventing infection.
In fact, the study found that children who had received the Pfizer vaccine were more likely to experience symptomatic COVID-19 than those who remained unvaccinated.
Such revelations have sparked widespread concerns among parents and stakeholders about the recommendations being made by health authorities, like the CDC.
The implication of these findings is profound and challenges the narrative that has dominated public health discussions for nearly four years.
Parents trusted officials when they advocated for vaccine mandates, often without considering natural immunity, which the study indicates provides better protection against COVID-19.
This contrasts sharply with the government's push for vaccination, which continues to ignore the growing body of evidence surrounding the effectiveness of natural immunity.
Critics argue that the failure to address these findings openly underlines a troubling trend where public health decisions appear influenced by agendas rather than the best interests of children.
Given the background that many nations chose not to vaccinate children at all, it raises a crucial question: Why were U.S. health authorities so quick to impose vaccines on this vulnerable population?
As trust in medical authorities reaches an all-time low, many are calling for a comprehensive review of public health policies and demanding accountability from those who led the push for vaccinations under dubious premises.
The study serves as a clarion call, urging parents to reconsider the implications of vaccine mandates and the overarching influence of bureaucratic agencies in their children's health decisions.
Amidst these revelations, it is essential to foster open discussions about vaccine safety, effectiveness, and the trustworthiness of expert guidance moving forward.
On this matter, parents deserve clarity, transparency, and choices based on factual evidence—not political pressure or fear tactics.
Sources:
lifenews.com
outkick.com
outkick.com
Latest News