The alarming revelation that Western governments are not just failing, but actively betraying genuine refugees seeking asylum, has been starkly articulated by Dr. Taleb Al Abdulmohsen, a Saudi psychiatrist.
In a recent interview with the RAIR Foundation, Dr. Taleb exposed an unsettling reality: Germany appears to be engaged in a systematic operation that prioritizes the resettlement of Islamic migrants while simultaneously persecuting ex-Muslims fleeing Sharia law.
His testimony sheds light on how bureaucratic policies in Germany have turned the asylum process into a tool that enriches the state at the expense of vulnerable individuals. While the German government boasts of humanitarian efforts, the facts tell a different story.
Dr. Taleb described a shocking discrepancy in the approval rates for asylum applications: a staggering 99.8% success rate for Syrians seeking refuge compared to only 70% for Saudi applicants, many of whom are ex-Muslims escaping severe persecution.
This policy approach raises critical questions about the motives of Western governments. Are they truly committed to humanitarian values, or are they weaponizing migration to implement a broader agenda that prioritizes certain ideologies over others?
What is particularly disturbing is that ex-Muslims—those who have bravely rejected the ties of Sharia oppression—find themselves further endangered by the policies meant to provide safety. Dr. Taleb detailed instances where the German authorities dismissed credible asylum claims of Saudi ex-Muslims, turning their backs on individuals who fit the very definition of a refugee seeking sanctuary.
He pointed out that while Islamic migrants with radical affiliations are often welcomed with open arms—frequently without serious vetting—ex-Muslims are interrogated harshly, their claims scrutinized and frequently dismissed based on ideological biases.
Germany's approach to asylum seekers has transformed into a troubling narrative of selective compassion, as evidenced by rental experiences Dr. Taleb recounted, detailing processes that actively undermine the safety of apostates.
Dr. Taleb’s experience suggests that what many may see as progressive policies are, in fact, leading to dangerous outcomes for those who challenge radical ideologies.
The psychiatrist didn’t hold back in condemning what he describes as “serious crimes” against ex-Muslims within the asylum system. He has alleged that these individuals are not merely neglected but targeted—facing possibilities of drug use encouragement, fraudulent deportation tactics, and even literal threats to their lives by authorities who should be safeguarding them.
These revelations align with concerns echoed by many conservatives, who argue that current immigration policies prioritize a narrative of diversity at the expense of coherent national security measures.
Moreover, Dr. Taleb's bold assertions illuminate a trend that extends beyond Germany. The United States, also under a migration policy that many conservatives deem reckless, appears to be experiencing a similar betrayal of values in its handling of refugees.
The implications of Dr. Taleb's testimony serve as a clarion call to the West.
Citizens must critically examine how their governments are handling immigration and whether national security and cultural integrity are being compromised under the guise of compassion and inclusivity.
Dr. Taleb’s courageous advocacy for ex-Muslims must not be overlooked. It serves as a potent reminder of the need to uphold the values of free speech and human dignity that define Western civilization, a battle increasingly in danger of being forgotten amid politically charged narratives.
As the West grapples with the fallout from these policy decisions, the urgent need for genuine dialogue about national integrity and the safeguarding of vulnerable populations has never been clearer.
Sources:
rairfoundation.comyahoo.comnewsweek.com