DEI Training: A Recipe for Division and Hostility
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Hostility and Division: The Unintended Consequences of DEI Training**
New research is shedding light on a troubling phenomenon related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training in workplaces across America.
A recent study from the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) has revealed that these training programs may be doing more harm than good, inadvertently fostering hostility rather than promoting understanding and cooperation.
The study, conducted in partnership with Rutgers University, highlights a significant correlation between exposure to DEI ideology and an increase in negative attitudes among participants.
According to Joel Finkelstein, Chief Science Officer at NCRI, participants who underwent DEI training reported heightened perceptions of bias and discrimination, even in clearly neutral scenarios.
This effect, dubbed "hostile attribution bias," leads individuals to interpret innocuous interactions as evidence of racial or religious animosity, resulting in unwarranted accusations against others.
Finkelstein explained, "When people are exposed to anti-racist material, they become more likely to see wrongdoing where none exists. This includes calls for punitive measures against individuals who are perceived as offenders without evidence."
Research indicates that DEI sessions, rather than bridging divides, may actually exacerbate tensions and reinforce divisive narratives.
The findings are striking: participants exposed to anti-racist literature from figures like Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo were more inclined to view others through a lens of suspicion and hostility.
In fact, the study found that 52% of American workers are subjected to DEI training, which costs corporations an estimated $8 billion annually.
Yet, these initiatives appear to be failing in their mission.
Rather than fostering inclusivity, the approach often encourages punitive attitudes, resulting in a climate of fear and suspicion.
This dramatic shift raises essential questions about the effectiveness and consequences of current DEI practices, particularly as they relate to genuine human bonding and understanding.
Finkelstein further observed that the authoritarian tendencies manifesting from these hostile biases are particularly concerning.
He noted, "The tendency to punish perceived offenders often leads to a broader societal decline in civil liberties and an increase in divisive attitudes."
As the conversation around DEI training evolves, these new insights challenge the prevailing narrative that such initiatives are universally beneficial.
With evidence suggesting that DEI programs may do more to divide than unite, it's essential that we rethink our approach to fostering true equality and inclusivity in our workplaces and communities.
Instead of perpetuating cycles of suspicion, we should advocate for productive and honest dialogues that move beyond fear and resentment, paving the way for lasting understanding and cooperation among diverse groups.
Sources:
twitchy.com
naturalnews.com
foxnews.com
New research is shedding light on a troubling phenomenon related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training in workplaces across America.
A recent study from the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) has revealed that these training programs may be doing more harm than good, inadvertently fostering hostility rather than promoting understanding and cooperation.
The study, conducted in partnership with Rutgers University, highlights a significant correlation between exposure to DEI ideology and an increase in negative attitudes among participants.
According to Joel Finkelstein, Chief Science Officer at NCRI, participants who underwent DEI training reported heightened perceptions of bias and discrimination, even in clearly neutral scenarios.
This effect, dubbed "hostile attribution bias," leads individuals to interpret innocuous interactions as evidence of racial or religious animosity, resulting in unwarranted accusations against others.
Finkelstein explained, "When people are exposed to anti-racist material, they become more likely to see wrongdoing where none exists. This includes calls for punitive measures against individuals who are perceived as offenders without evidence."
Research indicates that DEI sessions, rather than bridging divides, may actually exacerbate tensions and reinforce divisive narratives.
The findings are striking: participants exposed to anti-racist literature from figures like Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo were more inclined to view others through a lens of suspicion and hostility.
In fact, the study found that 52% of American workers are subjected to DEI training, which costs corporations an estimated $8 billion annually.
Yet, these initiatives appear to be failing in their mission.
Rather than fostering inclusivity, the approach often encourages punitive attitudes, resulting in a climate of fear and suspicion.
This dramatic shift raises essential questions about the effectiveness and consequences of current DEI practices, particularly as they relate to genuine human bonding and understanding.
Finkelstein further observed that the authoritarian tendencies manifesting from these hostile biases are particularly concerning.
He noted, "The tendency to punish perceived offenders often leads to a broader societal decline in civil liberties and an increase in divisive attitudes."
As the conversation around DEI training evolves, these new insights challenge the prevailing narrative that such initiatives are universally beneficial.
With evidence suggesting that DEI programs may do more to divide than unite, it's essential that we rethink our approach to fostering true equality and inclusivity in our workplaces and communities.
Instead of perpetuating cycles of suspicion, we should advocate for productive and honest dialogues that move beyond fear and resentment, paving the way for lasting understanding and cooperation among diverse groups.
Sources:
twitchy.com
naturalnews.com
foxnews.com
Latest News