Biden Administration's Taxpayer-Funded Censorship Must End
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 6 hours ago
**Taxpayer-Funded Censorship: A Disturbing New Norm**
In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that the Biden-Harris administration has funneled a staggering $267 million into research aimed at combatting "misinformation" using taxpayers' hard-earned dollars.
This funding spree, largely a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, raises serious concerns about the implications for free speech and the integrity of governmental operations.
The administration's approach to combat misinformation has resulted in a slew of government-backed initiatives designed to shape public opinion and censor dissenting voices.
Most notably, a $200,000 grant was allocated to a paper that implied populist leaders, including former President Donald Trump, hindered societal unity during the pandemic.
This alignment of the federal government with so-called "experts" to curtail misinformation suggests an unsettling trend towards silencing voices opposed to official narratives.
During the COVID-19 outbreak, bureaucrats engaged in extensive censorship, often partnering with social media firms to stifle discussions that deviated from government-sanctioned messaging.
Moreover, these anti-misinformation campaigns have been linked to significant breaches of public trust, with many citizens now wary of scientific recommendations that once seemed authoritative.
The research grants established under this initiative, which fetched more than $127 million specifically for COVID-related misinformation, were not without skepticism from various quarters.
Critics of this approach emphasize that such expenses have not only failed to foster better public understanding but have also contributed to a rapid decline in public faith in both science and government.
The troubling aspect of this campaign is how it turns the government into a gatekeeper of truth, trampling over the First Amendment rights of citizens in the process.
Recent Supreme Court rulings have allowed these actions to continue, even amidst acknowledgment from tech leaders that external pressures to censor were improper.
As a glaring example of this trend, a research paper funded by the National Science Foundation scrutinized Trump and other populist figures, advocating for a limited role for the public in health guidance.
Such initiatives raise the question: Who decides what constitutes misinformation, and how can the government justify intervening in necessary public discourse?
The urgency for accountability is becoming imperative as missteps in COVID-19 health guidelines repeatedly come to light, highlighting the flimsy underpinnings of much of the official messaging.
Moving forward, it is essential to scrutinize the Biden administration’s financial commitment to these research projects and whether they serve the public interest or merely perpetuate a singular narrative.
As taxpayer-funded censorship continues to dominate the federal spending landscape, there is an urgent need for policies that protect free expression rather than suppress it.
With the incoming Republican leadership, it is crucial to put an end to these misguided efforts and ensure the prioritization of accountability and public trust over government-sanctioned narratives.
Sources:
pme.uchicago.edu
theblaze.com
openthebooks.substack.com
In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that the Biden-Harris administration has funneled a staggering $267 million into research aimed at combatting "misinformation" using taxpayers' hard-earned dollars.
This funding spree, largely a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, raises serious concerns about the implications for free speech and the integrity of governmental operations.
The administration's approach to combat misinformation has resulted in a slew of government-backed initiatives designed to shape public opinion and censor dissenting voices.
Most notably, a $200,000 grant was allocated to a paper that implied populist leaders, including former President Donald Trump, hindered societal unity during the pandemic.
This alignment of the federal government with so-called "experts" to curtail misinformation suggests an unsettling trend towards silencing voices opposed to official narratives.
During the COVID-19 outbreak, bureaucrats engaged in extensive censorship, often partnering with social media firms to stifle discussions that deviated from government-sanctioned messaging.
Moreover, these anti-misinformation campaigns have been linked to significant breaches of public trust, with many citizens now wary of scientific recommendations that once seemed authoritative.
The research grants established under this initiative, which fetched more than $127 million specifically for COVID-related misinformation, were not without skepticism from various quarters.
Critics of this approach emphasize that such expenses have not only failed to foster better public understanding but have also contributed to a rapid decline in public faith in both science and government.
The troubling aspect of this campaign is how it turns the government into a gatekeeper of truth, trampling over the First Amendment rights of citizens in the process.
Recent Supreme Court rulings have allowed these actions to continue, even amidst acknowledgment from tech leaders that external pressures to censor were improper.
As a glaring example of this trend, a research paper funded by the National Science Foundation scrutinized Trump and other populist figures, advocating for a limited role for the public in health guidance.
Such initiatives raise the question: Who decides what constitutes misinformation, and how can the government justify intervening in necessary public discourse?
The urgency for accountability is becoming imperative as missteps in COVID-19 health guidelines repeatedly come to light, highlighting the flimsy underpinnings of much of the official messaging.
Moving forward, it is essential to scrutinize the Biden administration’s financial commitment to these research projects and whether they serve the public interest or merely perpetuate a singular narrative.
As taxpayer-funded censorship continues to dominate the federal spending landscape, there is an urgent need for policies that protect free expression rather than suppress it.
With the incoming Republican leadership, it is crucial to put an end to these misguided efforts and ensure the prioritization of accountability and public trust over government-sanctioned narratives.
Sources:
pme.uchicago.edu
theblaze.com
openthebooks.substack.com
Latest News