Arizona's Election Crisis: We Demand Voter Integrity Now
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 18 days ago
**Crisis** in Arizona: A Call for Election Integrity Amidst Voter Roll Failures
Recent revelations have sent shockwaves through the American electorate regarding the integrity of voter rolls in Arizona.
In an alarming discussion on WarRoom with Steve Bannon, attorney Daniel Kolodin highlighted a significant failure within the state's electoral system.
His public records request revealed no evidence that Arizona's Secretary of State, Adrian Fontes, has effectively removed ineligible voters from the rolls, leading to questions about the potential for voter fraud in upcoming elections.
With a staggering 1.2 million individuals still listed on the voter rolls, many of whom should not be eligible—such as the deceased, those adjudicated mentally incompetent, or individuals who have moved out of state—the credibility of Arizona's electoral process is at serious risk.
Kolodin stated, “The law requires that these voters be removed on an ongoing basis,” underscoring the responsibility of officials to ensure that voter lists are accurate and up to date.
The response from Fontes was telling, revealing a lack of documentation or action regarding these necessary removals. “I have no documents to show anything that I’ve been doing to take these folks off the rolls,” he reportedly admitted, raising further concerns about the commitment to election integrity from those in power.
In light of this negligence, Kolodin has taken commendable steps forward by filing a lawsuit designed to demand accountability and transparency in Arizona’s voting processes.
He emphasized the importance of swift judicial relief in securing the integrity of the voter rolls. As he put it, “With a major presidential election coming up, we want to check against our files and ensure nobody votes unlawfully.”
The impact of this legal battle is sure to resonate beyond Arizona’s borders.
Kolodin pointed out the critical nature of maintaining clean voter rolls in states where elections can swing by mere thousands of votes.
In a state where margins are often razor-thin—between 10,000 and 20,000 votes—allowing ineligible voters to participate in elections truly undermines democracy.
Recent court proceedings have shown that judges are beginning to take the issue of voter roll integrity seriously, signaling potential support for Kolodin's efforts.
This growing scrutiny not only empowers citizens but also sets a vital precedent for how voter integrity may be approached nationwide.
Voter roll maintenance is not merely a bureaucratic duty; it is a foundational aspect of democratic governance.
As Kolodin aptly stated, “Knowing the truth empowers voters.”
Engagement from concerned citizens is crucial as this lawsuit unfolds, fostering a culture of accountability and transparency that is desperately needed in our electoral system.
As the clock ticks down to the next presidential election, it is imperative that every American remain vigilant and informed about the fate of their democracy.
The developments in this case should serve as a wake-up call to all citizens who value the principle of fair elections.
In a time of increasing polarization, the fight for election integrity is one that should unite us all, regardless of political affiliation.
Kolodin's battle is emblematic of a broader movement advocating for transparency and accountability in elections across the nation.
Citizens are encouraged to follow this case closely and participate actively in discussions surrounding election integrity, ensuring their voices and votes are rightfully represented.
Sources:
warroom.org
endtimeheadlines.org
independentsentinel.com
Recent revelations have sent shockwaves through the American electorate regarding the integrity of voter rolls in Arizona.
In an alarming discussion on WarRoom with Steve Bannon, attorney Daniel Kolodin highlighted a significant failure within the state's electoral system.
His public records request revealed no evidence that Arizona's Secretary of State, Adrian Fontes, has effectively removed ineligible voters from the rolls, leading to questions about the potential for voter fraud in upcoming elections.
With a staggering 1.2 million individuals still listed on the voter rolls, many of whom should not be eligible—such as the deceased, those adjudicated mentally incompetent, or individuals who have moved out of state—the credibility of Arizona's electoral process is at serious risk.
Kolodin stated, “The law requires that these voters be removed on an ongoing basis,” underscoring the responsibility of officials to ensure that voter lists are accurate and up to date.
The response from Fontes was telling, revealing a lack of documentation or action regarding these necessary removals. “I have no documents to show anything that I’ve been doing to take these folks off the rolls,” he reportedly admitted, raising further concerns about the commitment to election integrity from those in power.
In light of this negligence, Kolodin has taken commendable steps forward by filing a lawsuit designed to demand accountability and transparency in Arizona’s voting processes.
He emphasized the importance of swift judicial relief in securing the integrity of the voter rolls. As he put it, “With a major presidential election coming up, we want to check against our files and ensure nobody votes unlawfully.”
The impact of this legal battle is sure to resonate beyond Arizona’s borders.
Kolodin pointed out the critical nature of maintaining clean voter rolls in states where elections can swing by mere thousands of votes.
In a state where margins are often razor-thin—between 10,000 and 20,000 votes—allowing ineligible voters to participate in elections truly undermines democracy.
Recent court proceedings have shown that judges are beginning to take the issue of voter roll integrity seriously, signaling potential support for Kolodin's efforts.
This growing scrutiny not only empowers citizens but also sets a vital precedent for how voter integrity may be approached nationwide.
Voter roll maintenance is not merely a bureaucratic duty; it is a foundational aspect of democratic governance.
As Kolodin aptly stated, “Knowing the truth empowers voters.”
Engagement from concerned citizens is crucial as this lawsuit unfolds, fostering a culture of accountability and transparency that is desperately needed in our electoral system.
As the clock ticks down to the next presidential election, it is imperative that every American remain vigilant and informed about the fate of their democracy.
The developments in this case should serve as a wake-up call to all citizens who value the principle of fair elections.
In a time of increasing polarization, the fight for election integrity is one that should unite us all, regardless of political affiliation.
Kolodin's battle is emblematic of a broader movement advocating for transparency and accountability in elections across the nation.
Citizens are encouraged to follow this case closely and participate actively in discussions surrounding election integrity, ensuring their voices and votes are rightfully represented.
Sources:
warroom.org
endtimeheadlines.org
independentsentinel.com
Latest News