New Evidence Reveals Troubling Truth About Ray Epps
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Corruption: The Truth Behind Ray Epps and January 6th Exposed**
In what many are calling a shocking revelation, new evidence has emerged that further complicates the narrative surrounding January 6th and the actions of Ray Epps.
Epps, a controversial figure often connected to the events of that day, has been largely shielded from prosecution, raising serious questions about his role and potential government involvement.
James Grant, a former political prisoner who endured the repercussions of participating in the Capitol protests, has recently come forward with an account that contradicts the mainstream media's portrayal of events.
While many protesters faced harsh sentences, Grant was sentenced to over two years in a federal prison, despite his assertions of innocence regarding any violent actions on that day.
He alleges that Epps was not merely a passive observer but played an instrumental role in inciting chaos.
According to Grant, just moments before a pivotal moment in the protests, Epps reportedly urged Ryan Samsel with the words "We need more [unintelligible]." This contrasts starkly with **the narrative that Epps encouraged protesters to calm down.**
Adding layers to this narrative, it has been revealed that Epps had previously called for storming the Capitol in a livestream broadcast on January 5th.
The continuous reports on Epps have only intensified scrutiny on the motivations of federal authorities.
While the Department of Justice has pursued charges against countless individuals who were merely present at the protest, their apparent lack of action against Epps raises uncomfortable questions about a potential double standard at play.
Furthermore, it is perplexing why Senator Ted Cruz's inquiries about Epps’s connection to federal agencies went unanswered during testimony from former FBI officials.
Could it be that Epps was functioning as an undercover agent, covertly prompting actions that would validate the Democrats’ narrative of an insurrection?
As more details continue to emerge, the foundation of the Democrats' case against those involved in the protests begins to look shakier.
The narrative that has dominated the media for nearly four years now faces mounting challenges.
It is imperative for the public to sift through the increasingly apparent discrepancies within the January 6th account.
Many Americans believe that those who participated in the protests should not serve as the scapegoats for events that may have been orchestrated behind the scenes.
The refusal to hold Epps more accountable, alongside the harsh punishments meted out to others, speaks volumes about the political motivations driving the ongoing investigations.
With further testimonies expected, clarity may finally prevail regarding the true story of January 6th and its players.
Sources:
americangulag.org
slaynews.com
lifenews.com
In what many are calling a shocking revelation, new evidence has emerged that further complicates the narrative surrounding January 6th and the actions of Ray Epps.
Epps, a controversial figure often connected to the events of that day, has been largely shielded from prosecution, raising serious questions about his role and potential government involvement.
James Grant, a former political prisoner who endured the repercussions of participating in the Capitol protests, has recently come forward with an account that contradicts the mainstream media's portrayal of events.
While many protesters faced harsh sentences, Grant was sentenced to over two years in a federal prison, despite his assertions of innocence regarding any violent actions on that day.
He alleges that Epps was not merely a passive observer but played an instrumental role in inciting chaos.
According to Grant, just moments before a pivotal moment in the protests, Epps reportedly urged Ryan Samsel with the words "We need more [unintelligible]." This contrasts starkly with **the narrative that Epps encouraged protesters to calm down.**
Adding layers to this narrative, it has been revealed that Epps had previously called for storming the Capitol in a livestream broadcast on January 5th.
The continuous reports on Epps have only intensified scrutiny on the motivations of federal authorities.
While the Department of Justice has pursued charges against countless individuals who were merely present at the protest, their apparent lack of action against Epps raises uncomfortable questions about a potential double standard at play.
Furthermore, it is perplexing why Senator Ted Cruz's inquiries about Epps’s connection to federal agencies went unanswered during testimony from former FBI officials.
Could it be that Epps was functioning as an undercover agent, covertly prompting actions that would validate the Democrats’ narrative of an insurrection?
As more details continue to emerge, the foundation of the Democrats' case against those involved in the protests begins to look shakier.
The narrative that has dominated the media for nearly four years now faces mounting challenges.
It is imperative for the public to sift through the increasingly apparent discrepancies within the January 6th account.
Many Americans believe that those who participated in the protests should not serve as the scapegoats for events that may have been orchestrated behind the scenes.
The refusal to hold Epps more accountable, alongside the harsh punishments meted out to others, speaks volumes about the political motivations driving the ongoing investigations.
With further testimonies expected, clarity may finally prevail regarding the true story of January 6th and its players.
Sources:
americangulag.org
slaynews.com
lifenews.com
Latest News