Biden Administration's Alleged Collusion on Gun Control Exposed
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Collusion Uncovered: House Oversight Committee Targets White House and ATF in Gun Control Inquiry**
In a bold move signaling a commitment to uphold Second Amendment rights, the House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), has issued subpoenas to both the White House and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
This action stems from grave allegations of collusion between the Biden administration and anti-gun groups, particularly concerning the ongoing litigation surrounding the case of City of Chicago v. Glock.
Chairman Comer has raised alarms over a clandestine meeting that reportedly took place on December 20, 2023, involving representatives from the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and Glock’s officials. He suggested that this private gathering may have involved coercive tactics aimed at forcing Glock to alter its pistol designs.
The implications of such collusion are significant, suggesting potential ethical violations and an abuse of power by the administration. In a poignant letter to White House Gun Violence Prevention Director Stefanie Feldman, Comer expressed concerns that the administration might have coordinated with outside parties to initiate litigation against Glock, a company representing the interests of lawful gun owners.
The subpoenas demand a range of communications between the White House office, the ATF, and various gun control organizations, including Everytown for Gun Safety. This scrutiny seeks to uncover the extent of the alleged improper interactions that may have influenced the court case against Glock.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) has applauded the Oversight Committee's actions, underscoring the potential dangers of government interference in lawful business practices. NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane emphasized that the outlined cooperation between federal agencies and anti-gun activists represents a troubling turn toward "lawfare" tactics against the gun industry.
Keane stated, “This office is a taxpayer-funded effort to do the bidding of radical, special interest groups to weaponize the courts and advance an agenda to deprive Americans of their Second Amendment rights.”
While the administration has dismissed these allegations, branding the inquiry as a safeguard for gun industry profits, the reality may be far different. Critics assert that the supposed collusion indicates a deeper crisis within the Biden administration’s approach to firearms regulation, prioritizing political agendas over constitutional rights.
As the investigation unfolds, the pressure mounts on the Biden administration and the ATF to comply with the subpoenas. Lawmakers and citizens alike await clarity on whether the administration misappropriated federal authority to undermine the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
This inquiry not only stands as a potential check on government overreach but also highlights the enduring fight for the Second Amendment, reminding Americans of the critical need to remain vigilant against encroachments on their rights. As the story develops, it promises to resonate deeply in the ongoing national debate over gun control.
Sources:
thetruthaboutguns.com
gopusa.com
realclearpolicy.com
In a bold move signaling a commitment to uphold Second Amendment rights, the House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), has issued subpoenas to both the White House and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
This action stems from grave allegations of collusion between the Biden administration and anti-gun groups, particularly concerning the ongoing litigation surrounding the case of City of Chicago v. Glock.
Chairman Comer has raised alarms over a clandestine meeting that reportedly took place on December 20, 2023, involving representatives from the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and Glock’s officials. He suggested that this private gathering may have involved coercive tactics aimed at forcing Glock to alter its pistol designs.
The implications of such collusion are significant, suggesting potential ethical violations and an abuse of power by the administration. In a poignant letter to White House Gun Violence Prevention Director Stefanie Feldman, Comer expressed concerns that the administration might have coordinated with outside parties to initiate litigation against Glock, a company representing the interests of lawful gun owners.
The subpoenas demand a range of communications between the White House office, the ATF, and various gun control organizations, including Everytown for Gun Safety. This scrutiny seeks to uncover the extent of the alleged improper interactions that may have influenced the court case against Glock.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) has applauded the Oversight Committee's actions, underscoring the potential dangers of government interference in lawful business practices. NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane emphasized that the outlined cooperation between federal agencies and anti-gun activists represents a troubling turn toward "lawfare" tactics against the gun industry.
Keane stated, “This office is a taxpayer-funded effort to do the bidding of radical, special interest groups to weaponize the courts and advance an agenda to deprive Americans of their Second Amendment rights.”
While the administration has dismissed these allegations, branding the inquiry as a safeguard for gun industry profits, the reality may be far different. Critics assert that the supposed collusion indicates a deeper crisis within the Biden administration’s approach to firearms regulation, prioritizing political agendas over constitutional rights.
As the investigation unfolds, the pressure mounts on the Biden administration and the ATF to comply with the subpoenas. Lawmakers and citizens alike await clarity on whether the administration misappropriated federal authority to undermine the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
This inquiry not only stands as a potential check on government overreach but also highlights the enduring fight for the Second Amendment, reminding Americans of the critical need to remain vigilant against encroachments on their rights. As the story develops, it promises to resonate deeply in the ongoing national debate over gun control.
Sources:
thetruthaboutguns.com
gopusa.com
realclearpolicy.com
Latest News