**Warning: The Bird Flu Summit's Hidden Agenda?**
As New Yorkers brace for a planned "Bird Flu Summit" on October 21, experts warn of potential parallels to the pre-COVID Event 201 scenario that many believe was a precursor to the pandemic upheaval.
This summit, organized in collaboration with major health agencies, raises eyebrows, especially given its timing just days before early voting begins.
Critics argue that the event could be more about instilling fear in the public than addressing genuine health threats.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a prominent cardiologist, expressed concerns that such “drills” have often served as a means to promote vaccines rather than truly prepare for public health emergencies.
He remarked, “These tabletop exercises are designed to increase anxiety levels in the population, ultimately steering them toward a vaccination narrative.”
Reports indicate that the International Bird Flu Summit in Washington, D.C. will involve two New York City hospitals, further intensifying speculation around the event’s true motives.
Many are questioning whether this summit aims to encourage more avian influenza vaccinations, echoing a strategy seen during the COVID-19 pandemic that revolved around inducing a sense of fear regarding viral outbreaks.
While the mainstream media often downplays concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, studies continue to emerge challenging the narrative surrounding COVID-19 vaccines that many health officials continue to endorse.
Epidemiologist Nicholas Hulscher has reassured the public that current silent outbreaks of H5N1—the strain in question—among animal populations do not pose a significant human health risk.
Yet, fear-mongering tactics might still take precedence as a means to influence public opinion and behavior ahead of critical midterm elections.
With an underlying suspicion of politicized health initiatives gaining traction, the upcoming summit serves as a reminder that vigilance is necessary.
As we approach the flu season and the political climate heats up, it remains crucial for voters to critically assess the information provided by both government officials and health agencies.
In an era rife with misinformation and rushed agendas, many are compelled to ask: is this summit a genuine precaution, or is it an orchestrated event designed to align with the interests of a political establishment seeking to maintain control over public sentiment?
The stakes are high, and the need for transparency has never been more critical.
Sources:
thegatewaypundit.comheadlineusa.comchildrenshealthdefense.org