California AG Rob Bonta's Hypocrisy Exposed on Climate
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 1 hour ago
**Hypocrisy Unmasked: California AG Fumbles Under Pressure While Targeting ExxonMobil**
In a striking display of political posturing, California Attorney General Rob Bonta struggled to defend his recent lawsuit against ExxonMobil, raising questions about the motivations driving the Democratic establishment's relentless assault on American businesses.
During an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” Bonta was unable to provide compelling arguments to support his claim that the oil giant has misled the public about its recycling efforts. His lack of clarity became glaringly apparent as anchor Becky Quick challenged him on the apparent contradiction of his ongoing crusade against carbon emissions while he flew to New York City, emitting considerable carbon dioxide himself to attend “Climate Week NYC.”
"Your point is we shouldn’t have jet fuel?" queried Quick, highlighting the absurdity of Bonta’s position.
Bonta alleged that ExxonMobil's “advanced recycling” technology, which breaks down plastics to produce valuable new products, only manages to recycle 1% of its plastic output, subsequently converting 92% into transportation fuel. However, Quick presented a logical counterpoint: isn’t any recycling effort better than none at all?
Bonta’s evasive responses suggest the possibility that his lawsuit is less about environmental accountability and more about political grandstanding. This incident underscores a broader trend within the Democratic Party, where punitive measures against companies like ExxonMobil often serve as tools for advancing a climate agenda, regardless of the efficacy or truth behind the claims made.
Democrats like Bonta appear willing to disregard their own contributions to carbon emissions to promote a narrative that vilifies corporations rather than confronting the real economic consequences of stringent regulations.
In a climate where energy independence and responsible corporate behavior should take precedence, the legal actions from Bonta could threaten jobs, move investment away from crucial technology, and ultimately hurt consumers.
As the political landscape shifts and the upcoming elections loom, the Republican message of deregulation and support for American energy initiatives may resonate even more, challenging the inconsistencies found in the current administration's approach towards energy companies.
This incident serves as a reminder that while the left criticizes big oil, they often overlook their own complicity in promoting a culture of environmental hypocrisy. The American public deserves an honest discourse about energy and sustainability, one not plagued by the political biases and contradictions that currently dominate the narrative.
Sources:
wattsupwiththat.com
zerohedge.com
theepochtimes.com
In a striking display of political posturing, California Attorney General Rob Bonta struggled to defend his recent lawsuit against ExxonMobil, raising questions about the motivations driving the Democratic establishment's relentless assault on American businesses.
During an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” Bonta was unable to provide compelling arguments to support his claim that the oil giant has misled the public about its recycling efforts. His lack of clarity became glaringly apparent as anchor Becky Quick challenged him on the apparent contradiction of his ongoing crusade against carbon emissions while he flew to New York City, emitting considerable carbon dioxide himself to attend “Climate Week NYC.”
"Your point is we shouldn’t have jet fuel?" queried Quick, highlighting the absurdity of Bonta’s position.
Bonta alleged that ExxonMobil's “advanced recycling” technology, which breaks down plastics to produce valuable new products, only manages to recycle 1% of its plastic output, subsequently converting 92% into transportation fuel. However, Quick presented a logical counterpoint: isn’t any recycling effort better than none at all?
Bonta’s evasive responses suggest the possibility that his lawsuit is less about environmental accountability and more about political grandstanding. This incident underscores a broader trend within the Democratic Party, where punitive measures against companies like ExxonMobil often serve as tools for advancing a climate agenda, regardless of the efficacy or truth behind the claims made.
Democrats like Bonta appear willing to disregard their own contributions to carbon emissions to promote a narrative that vilifies corporations rather than confronting the real economic consequences of stringent regulations.
In a climate where energy independence and responsible corporate behavior should take precedence, the legal actions from Bonta could threaten jobs, move investment away from crucial technology, and ultimately hurt consumers.
As the political landscape shifts and the upcoming elections loom, the Republican message of deregulation and support for American energy initiatives may resonate even more, challenging the inconsistencies found in the current administration's approach towards energy companies.
This incident serves as a reminder that while the left criticizes big oil, they often overlook their own complicity in promoting a culture of environmental hypocrisy. The American public deserves an honest discourse about energy and sustainability, one not plagued by the political biases and contradictions that currently dominate the narrative.
Sources:
wattsupwiththat.com
zerohedge.com
theepochtimes.com
Latest News