**Chaos at the Border: Kamala Harris's Ineffective Plan Exposed**
In a stunning reveal, Kamala Harris's much-touted border security plan is little more than a half-hearted attempt to address a national crisis.
Her proposal to add 1,500 border agents amounts to a mere drop in the bucket, adding only one agent for every five miles of the 1,933-mile southern border.
Former Trump administration officials, such as Ken Cuccinelli and Tom Homan, have criticized the plan as insufficient and disingenuous.
Homan, a veteran of Trump’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement, stated that the additional agents would not meaningfully change the current border situation.
He pointed out that around 80 percent of border agents are not on active duty at any given time.
In context, this plan appears more like a public relations strategy than a genuine effort to secure the border.
Cuccinelli emphasized that the Democrats’ focus seems to be on facilitating migration rather than enforcing actual border security measures.
He accused Harris of intending to use the proposed agents to help migrants rather than deter illegal crossings.
Furthermore, the ultimate goal of the Biden administration’s border policies seems to align more with pro-migration advocacy than with maintaining a secure border.
Details from the past reveal that Harris supported a border security bill that indirectly promoted more lenient measures, including an increase in catch-and-release policies, which many conservatives view as tantamount to amnesty.
For conservatives and concerned citizens, it’s clear that simply hiring more personnel without a fundamental change in policy will not secure the southern border.
The American public deserves a genuine and effective approach to immigration that upholds the rule of law and ensures national security.
It’s time for a return to the commonsense policies established during the Trump administration, which successfully reduced illegal crossings and strengthened border security.
As the upcoming election approaches, voters must consider whether they want leaders who prioritize real solutions over ineffective rhetoric.
Sources:
breitbart.comindependentsentinel.comheadlineusa.com