FDA's Monkeypox Vaccine Risks Spark Public Outrage
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 9 hours ago
**Controversy Erupts Over FDA's Troubling Monkeypox Vaccine Admissions**
In a startling revelation, the FDA has acknowledged serious risks tied to the monkeypox vaccine, raising alarm bells among citizens concerned about health safety and government transparency.
The vaccine, known as ACAM2000, was approved in late August for monkeypox prevention, a reauthorization of a shot that originally targeted smallpox.
However, buried within the FDA's messaging are warnings that unvaccinated individuals could experience grave complications, including potential death, from close contact with vaccinated persons.
This is a troubling admission that calls into question the efficacy and safety protocols surrounding this newly endorsed vaccine.
The FDA reported that the live vaccinia virus used in the monkeypox vaccine can be transmitted to those without the vaccine, creating a public health concern that many may not have anticipated.
Warnings of severe side effects, reminiscent of those associated with COVID-19 vaccinations, are astonishingly downplayed on the FDA’s website.
Critics argue that this lack of transparency damages public trust in health institutions at a time when accountability is essential.
Compounding the issue, it has come to light that the FDA reportedly possesses no conclusive scientific evidence of the existence of the monkeypox virus itself, raising suspicions about the motives behind the widespread vaccination campaign.
As public scrutiny intensifies, it becomes imperative to question not only the safety of vaccines but also the broader implications of public health decisions made by government agencies.
Many skeptics view this as part of a larger narrative—one where fearmongering and profit motives intertwine, calling to mind the debacle surrounding COVID vaccines.
Registered concerns echo a previous sentiment voiced by Senator Ron Johnson, who held a roundtable discussion earlier this year that called into question the integrity of federal health agencies.
In a time when American citizens seek clarity and reassurance, these revelations highlight the urgent need for a reevaluation of public health policies and greater scrutiny over governmental health advisories.
This situation opens the floor to vital discussions about individual liberty, informed consent, and the role of government in personal health decisions—a focal point that resonates deeply within Republican and conservative values.
As the narrative unfolds, the onus is now on citizens and lawmakers alike to demand accountability, transparency, and stringent evaluation of vaccines before they endanger public health.
Sources:
slaynews.com
thegatewaypundit.com
uncanceled.news
In a startling revelation, the FDA has acknowledged serious risks tied to the monkeypox vaccine, raising alarm bells among citizens concerned about health safety and government transparency.
The vaccine, known as ACAM2000, was approved in late August for monkeypox prevention, a reauthorization of a shot that originally targeted smallpox.
However, buried within the FDA's messaging are warnings that unvaccinated individuals could experience grave complications, including potential death, from close contact with vaccinated persons.
This is a troubling admission that calls into question the efficacy and safety protocols surrounding this newly endorsed vaccine.
The FDA reported that the live vaccinia virus used in the monkeypox vaccine can be transmitted to those without the vaccine, creating a public health concern that many may not have anticipated.
Warnings of severe side effects, reminiscent of those associated with COVID-19 vaccinations, are astonishingly downplayed on the FDA’s website.
Critics argue that this lack of transparency damages public trust in health institutions at a time when accountability is essential.
Compounding the issue, it has come to light that the FDA reportedly possesses no conclusive scientific evidence of the existence of the monkeypox virus itself, raising suspicions about the motives behind the widespread vaccination campaign.
As public scrutiny intensifies, it becomes imperative to question not only the safety of vaccines but also the broader implications of public health decisions made by government agencies.
Many skeptics view this as part of a larger narrative—one where fearmongering and profit motives intertwine, calling to mind the debacle surrounding COVID vaccines.
Registered concerns echo a previous sentiment voiced by Senator Ron Johnson, who held a roundtable discussion earlier this year that called into question the integrity of federal health agencies.
In a time when American citizens seek clarity and reassurance, these revelations highlight the urgent need for a reevaluation of public health policies and greater scrutiny over governmental health advisories.
This situation opens the floor to vital discussions about individual liberty, informed consent, and the role of government in personal health decisions—a focal point that resonates deeply within Republican and conservative values.
As the narrative unfolds, the onus is now on citizens and lawmakers alike to demand accountability, transparency, and stringent evaluation of vaccines before they endanger public health.
Sources:
slaynews.com
thegatewaypundit.com
uncanceled.news
Latest News