Kamala Harris's Taxpayer-Funded Surgery Hypocrisy Exposed
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 75 days ago
**Hypocrisy Exposed: Kamala Harris’s Past Support for Taxpayer-Funded Sex Change Surgeries for Illegal Immigrants**
In a startling revelation, Vice President Kamala Harris's past position on immigration and taxpayer dollars has resurfaced, raising questions about her commitment to responsible governance and fiscal prudence.
Harris, while serving as a U.S. senator, pledged her support for taxpayer-funded sex change surgeries for individuals detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This was revealed in a 2019 questionnaire submitted to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), where she advocated for comprehensive gender transition treatment for those in federal custody.
The implications of these statements are significant, especially as Harris attempts to reshape her image during the current campaign cycle. With looming concerns regarding border security and immigration policies, her earlier support of such policies raises doubts about her seriousness in addressing the issues at hand.
In her responses to the ACLU, Harris asserted that “transition treatment is a medical necessity” and expressed her intent to ensure that detainees would have access to what she characterized as medically necessary care.
Her stance included a commitment to reducing funding for ICE, underscoring her alignment with progressive elements of her party that prioritize social agendas over security.
As the current administration faces growing scrutiny over immigration and a record number of illegal crossings at the southern border, Harris’s previous views stand in stark contrast to her recent attempts to portray herself as a border hawk.
In recent campaign ads, she has claimed to support increasing Border Patrol agents and using advanced technology to combat drug trafficking. However, her previous declaration that the border wall was “un-American” only reinforces the skepticism surrounding her newfound conservative rhetoric.
The timing of these contradictions could not be more critical. As the country moves closer to the November elections, Harris's past positions might hinder her ability to connect with voters who are increasingly concerned about immigration issues and government spending.
Additionally, her hesitation to endorse measures aimed at election security, like requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, highlights a reluctance to fully embrace bipartisan solutions. This has led to a palpable divide between her and conservative lawmakers who are determined to ensure the integrity of U.S. elections.
As the 2024 campaign heats up, Harris's shifting narrative raises a major question: Can voters trust someone whose policies have historically favored open borders and social spending at the expense of taxpayers? The answer may significantly influence the outcome of this election year.
Sources:
rumble.com
dailycallernewsfoundation.org
conservativefiringline.com
In a startling revelation, Vice President Kamala Harris's past position on immigration and taxpayer dollars has resurfaced, raising questions about her commitment to responsible governance and fiscal prudence.
Harris, while serving as a U.S. senator, pledged her support for taxpayer-funded sex change surgeries for individuals detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This was revealed in a 2019 questionnaire submitted to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), where she advocated for comprehensive gender transition treatment for those in federal custody.
The implications of these statements are significant, especially as Harris attempts to reshape her image during the current campaign cycle. With looming concerns regarding border security and immigration policies, her earlier support of such policies raises doubts about her seriousness in addressing the issues at hand.
In her responses to the ACLU, Harris asserted that “transition treatment is a medical necessity” and expressed her intent to ensure that detainees would have access to what she characterized as medically necessary care.
Her stance included a commitment to reducing funding for ICE, underscoring her alignment with progressive elements of her party that prioritize social agendas over security.
As the current administration faces growing scrutiny over immigration and a record number of illegal crossings at the southern border, Harris’s previous views stand in stark contrast to her recent attempts to portray herself as a border hawk.
In recent campaign ads, she has claimed to support increasing Border Patrol agents and using advanced technology to combat drug trafficking. However, her previous declaration that the border wall was “un-American” only reinforces the skepticism surrounding her newfound conservative rhetoric.
The timing of these contradictions could not be more critical. As the country moves closer to the November elections, Harris's past positions might hinder her ability to connect with voters who are increasingly concerned about immigration issues and government spending.
Additionally, her hesitation to endorse measures aimed at election security, like requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, highlights a reluctance to fully embrace bipartisan solutions. This has led to a palpable divide between her and conservative lawmakers who are determined to ensure the integrity of U.S. elections.
As the 2024 campaign heats up, Harris's shifting narrative raises a major question: Can voters trust someone whose policies have historically favored open borders and social spending at the expense of taxpayers? The answer may significantly influence the outcome of this election year.
Sources:
rumble.com
dailycallernewsfoundation.org
conservativefiringline.com
Latest News