CDC Ignites Controversy Over Unlicensed Infant Vaccinations
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 77 days ago
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has ignited fierce debate over its new guidelines recommending that infants as young as six months receive up to three doses of unlicensed COVID-19 mRNA vaccines by the time they are nine months old.
Critics argue that these proposals ignore the glaring evidence that COVID-19 poses minimal risk to young children, regardless of vaccination status. The CDC's guidance, released on August 30, contradicts the lack of licensed COVID vaccines for children aged 12 and under.
Notably, the agency emphasizes that babies must be considered “up to date” with their vaccinations only if they receive multiple doses of these experimental injections.
This decision arises amidst mounting concerns regarding the safety of such vaccinations for children. Recent studies have linked mRNA vaccines to a distressing rise in myocarditis and pericarditis—serious inflammatory conditions of the heart that have notably increased since the COVID vaccination campaign began.
A compelling study from the University of Oxford challenges the narrative propagated by some health officials and mainstream media, asserting that all reported cases of myocarditis in children occurred after vaccination, not as a result of the virus itself. The research examined a substantial dataset consisting of over one million children and found that severe complications related to COVID-19 were exceedingly rare.
Despite this compelling evidence, the CDC has previously acknowledged that mRNA shots have led to a tragic number of fatalities in young Americans, further complicating the agency's credibility. Given these revelations, many parents are left asking: Why is the CDC pushing for unlicensed shots for infants when the risks associated with these vaccines are becoming increasingly clear?
As health agencies grapple with their message, families across the country are urged to remain vigilant and critically assess what is being put forth as “medical guidance.” The safety and well-being of our children may very well depend on it.
Sources:
slaynews.com
shtfplan.com
npr.org
Critics argue that these proposals ignore the glaring evidence that COVID-19 poses minimal risk to young children, regardless of vaccination status. The CDC's guidance, released on August 30, contradicts the lack of licensed COVID vaccines for children aged 12 and under.
Notably, the agency emphasizes that babies must be considered “up to date” with their vaccinations only if they receive multiple doses of these experimental injections.
This decision arises amidst mounting concerns regarding the safety of such vaccinations for children. Recent studies have linked mRNA vaccines to a distressing rise in myocarditis and pericarditis—serious inflammatory conditions of the heart that have notably increased since the COVID vaccination campaign began.
A compelling study from the University of Oxford challenges the narrative propagated by some health officials and mainstream media, asserting that all reported cases of myocarditis in children occurred after vaccination, not as a result of the virus itself. The research examined a substantial dataset consisting of over one million children and found that severe complications related to COVID-19 were exceedingly rare.
Despite this compelling evidence, the CDC has previously acknowledged that mRNA shots have led to a tragic number of fatalities in young Americans, further complicating the agency's credibility. Given these revelations, many parents are left asking: Why is the CDC pushing for unlicensed shots for infants when the risks associated with these vaccines are becoming increasingly clear?
As health agencies grapple with their message, families across the country are urged to remain vigilant and critically assess what is being put forth as “medical guidance.” The safety and well-being of our children may very well depend on it.
Sources:
slaynews.com
shtfplan.com
npr.org
Latest News