Kamala Harris: Tough on Crime or Just Talk?
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 80 days ago
**Hypocrisy Unmasked: Kamala Harris’ Bold Claims vs. Troubling Reality**
In a striking revelation, Kamala Harris's recent campaign ads aim to reshape her narrative as "tough" on crime, specifically drug trafficking.
However, this contrasts sharply with her own record as a prosecutor in San Francisco, where she was known for proposing policies that many now label as dangerously lenient.
Back in 2005, while serving as District Attorney, Harris recommended that drug dealers should not be prosecuted until their third arrest.
This policy, which received immediate backlash from law enforcement officials, illustrated her progressive stance that many believe did more harm than good.
Former Deputy Chief of the San Francisco Police Department, Kevin Cashman, was among those who condemned Harris's approach, likening it to a "Catch and Release" strategy that would leave the city vulnerable to rampant drug dealing.
Harris’s defenders might argue that intentions were to manage the system better, but critics point out that such an approach sent an alarming message to criminals that there were little to no consequences for their actions.
Former Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness recalls how Harris's tactics were criticized statewide, calling her methods “an outlier” within California’s law enforcement community.
Adding to the hypocrisy, Harris’s recent campaign ads claim she "took on drug cartels" and "spent decades fighting violent crime," contrasting sharply with her historic record that suggests a much softer approach.
The frustration among California lawmakers and former police officers is palpable, with GOP Congressman Kevin Kiley asserting that the Harris campaign is attempting to "reinvent reality."
As voters head to the polls, it becomes increasingly crucial for them to scrutinize the track records of those they consider for leadership.
Kamala Harris's bid for the presidency seems to hinge on a narrative that many believe does not align with her history—a tactic that could ultimately backfire as Americans become more aware of the truths behind political grandstanding.
Sources:
thestoryexchange.org
dailymail.co.uk
modernity.news
In a striking revelation, Kamala Harris's recent campaign ads aim to reshape her narrative as "tough" on crime, specifically drug trafficking.
However, this contrasts sharply with her own record as a prosecutor in San Francisco, where she was known for proposing policies that many now label as dangerously lenient.
Back in 2005, while serving as District Attorney, Harris recommended that drug dealers should not be prosecuted until their third arrest.
This policy, which received immediate backlash from law enforcement officials, illustrated her progressive stance that many believe did more harm than good.
Former Deputy Chief of the San Francisco Police Department, Kevin Cashman, was among those who condemned Harris's approach, likening it to a "Catch and Release" strategy that would leave the city vulnerable to rampant drug dealing.
Harris’s defenders might argue that intentions were to manage the system better, but critics point out that such an approach sent an alarming message to criminals that there were little to no consequences for their actions.
Former Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness recalls how Harris's tactics were criticized statewide, calling her methods “an outlier” within California’s law enforcement community.
Adding to the hypocrisy, Harris’s recent campaign ads claim she "took on drug cartels" and "spent decades fighting violent crime," contrasting sharply with her historic record that suggests a much softer approach.
The frustration among California lawmakers and former police officers is palpable, with GOP Congressman Kevin Kiley asserting that the Harris campaign is attempting to "reinvent reality."
As voters head to the polls, it becomes increasingly crucial for them to scrutinize the track records of those they consider for leadership.
Kamala Harris's bid for the presidency seems to hinge on a narrative that many believe does not align with her history—a tactic that could ultimately backfire as Americans become more aware of the truths behind political grandstanding.
Sources:
thestoryexchange.org
dailymail.co.uk
modernity.news
Latest News