DEI Spending Raises Alarming National Security Questions
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 87 days ago
**Silence on DEI Scrutiny Highlights National Security Concerns**
The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is facing increasing criticism for its refusal to release information regarding the impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) spending on national security.
A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the Center to Advance Security in America (CASA) sought clarity on how the DOD justifies its $86.5 million investments in DEI initiatives for the fiscal year 2023.
James Fitzpatrick, an Army Veteran and CASA leader, indicated that the DOD has acknowledged the request but has not provided any documentation after more than 100 days.
Fitzpatrick argued that if DEI is touted as the military's "greatest strength," the ongoing hiring freeze on DEI positions should raise alarm bells about a potential decline in national security. He stated, “If the DOD imposes a DEI hiring freeze… then there must be a corresponding lack of national security if their position is spending more on DEI means the military gets better and stronger.”
The recent National Defense Authorization Act mandated a freeze on new DEI hires while the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducts a review of the spending. Despite this, the DOD has consistently emphasized the importance of diversity in its mission, insisting that it is vital for maintaining military readiness and effectiveness.
However, skepticism regarding the efficacy of DEI spending is valid, especially when past Congressional spending reports reveal little connection between diversity initiatives and tangible improvements in national security. As Fitzpatrick pointed out, federal agencies are generally required to comply with FOIA requests in a timely manner—a standard the DOD has seemingly neglected.
This situation raises questions about the true priorities of the department. The DOD's commitment to diversity is clear, with reports stating that embracing DEI is an essential strategy for attracting and retaining the best talent. Yet, when national security hangs in the balance, it seems perplexing that the DOD would prioritize these initiatives without empirical backing.
As the debate over DEI continues, the very safety and readiness of the military may be compromised under the weight of politically motivated agendas. Concerns for the military's operational effectiveness must always trump broader cultural initiatives, especially when our national security is at stake.
By demanding transparency from the DOD through FOIA requests and lawsuits, veterans and concerned citizens alike are advocating for a military that prioritizes its primary objective: defending our nation.
Sources:
justthenews.com
saraacarter.com
naturalnews.com
The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is facing increasing criticism for its refusal to release information regarding the impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) spending on national security.
A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the Center to Advance Security in America (CASA) sought clarity on how the DOD justifies its $86.5 million investments in DEI initiatives for the fiscal year 2023.
James Fitzpatrick, an Army Veteran and CASA leader, indicated that the DOD has acknowledged the request but has not provided any documentation after more than 100 days.
Fitzpatrick argued that if DEI is touted as the military's "greatest strength," the ongoing hiring freeze on DEI positions should raise alarm bells about a potential decline in national security. He stated, “If the DOD imposes a DEI hiring freeze… then there must be a corresponding lack of national security if their position is spending more on DEI means the military gets better and stronger.”
The recent National Defense Authorization Act mandated a freeze on new DEI hires while the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducts a review of the spending. Despite this, the DOD has consistently emphasized the importance of diversity in its mission, insisting that it is vital for maintaining military readiness and effectiveness.
However, skepticism regarding the efficacy of DEI spending is valid, especially when past Congressional spending reports reveal little connection between diversity initiatives and tangible improvements in national security. As Fitzpatrick pointed out, federal agencies are generally required to comply with FOIA requests in a timely manner—a standard the DOD has seemingly neglected.
This situation raises questions about the true priorities of the department. The DOD's commitment to diversity is clear, with reports stating that embracing DEI is an essential strategy for attracting and retaining the best talent. Yet, when national security hangs in the balance, it seems perplexing that the DOD would prioritize these initiatives without empirical backing.
As the debate over DEI continues, the very safety and readiness of the military may be compromised under the weight of politically motivated agendas. Concerns for the military's operational effectiveness must always trump broader cultural initiatives, especially when our national security is at stake.
By demanding transparency from the DOD through FOIA requests and lawsuits, veterans and concerned citizens alike are advocating for a military that prioritizes its primary objective: defending our nation.
Sources:
justthenews.com
saraacarter.com
naturalnews.com
Latest News