Hydroxychloroquine: Politics Over Science During Pandemic Crisis
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 87 days ago
**Hydroxychloroquine: A Victim of Political Agendas in the Pandemic Narrative**
In a startling revelation, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson's new book, “Follow the Science: How Big Pharma Misleads, Obscures, and Prevails,” shines a light on the politicization of hydroxychloroquine throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
This supposed ‘discredited’ treatment was heavily criticized by mainstream media and public health authorities, particularly after President Trump endorsed it as a potential remedy.
However, numerous experts, including cardiologist Dr. William O'Neill from the Henry Ford Health System, argue that the evidence supporting hydroxychloroquine was systematically undermined for political reasons rather than scientific validity.
Dr. O'Neill, who prescribed hydroxychloroquine to COVID patients and claims to have seen improvements, expressed disbelief at the negative media portrayal of a drug that has been both affordable and available for decades.
He noted the uncommon politicization of medical treatments in his 40 years of practice, stating, “The media set out to disprove and discredit it without any regard for science.”
Amidst this chaotic landscape, a troubling pattern emerges: many members of the government’s COVID treatment panel and advisory groups had affiliations with pharmaceutical companies linked to alternative treatments like remdesivir, raising concerns about conflict of interest and the integrity of their recommendations.
Attkisson's findings suggest that as the government promoted more expensive drugs, the unyielding advocacy for hydroxychloroquine—a low-cost generic—was dismissed, reflecting a troubling trend where financial ties overshadow scientific inquiry.
Despite the mainstream media’s efforts to paint hydroxychloroquine as dangerous, the truth reveals a more insidious narrative at play: one where economic interests dictate the health decisions of millions, often to the detriment of patients seeking real solutions during a public health crisis.
This controversy is not just about a single drug; it epitomizes the broader struggle between political motives and genuine scientific discourse.
As we navigate the aftermath of the pandemic, the call for transparency and scientific integrity becomes more urgent than ever.
In the words of Dr. O'Neill, the ultimate loss in this battle may well be the insights we could have gained had the politics not so thoroughly infected the scientific process surrounding COVID-19 treatments.
As common citizens, it is crucial to remain vigilant about these patterns and advocate for approaches prioritizing patient welfare above financial gain.
Sources:
justthenews.com
bearingarms.com
wattsupwiththat.com
In a startling revelation, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson's new book, “Follow the Science: How Big Pharma Misleads, Obscures, and Prevails,” shines a light on the politicization of hydroxychloroquine throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
This supposed ‘discredited’ treatment was heavily criticized by mainstream media and public health authorities, particularly after President Trump endorsed it as a potential remedy.
However, numerous experts, including cardiologist Dr. William O'Neill from the Henry Ford Health System, argue that the evidence supporting hydroxychloroquine was systematically undermined for political reasons rather than scientific validity.
Dr. O'Neill, who prescribed hydroxychloroquine to COVID patients and claims to have seen improvements, expressed disbelief at the negative media portrayal of a drug that has been both affordable and available for decades.
He noted the uncommon politicization of medical treatments in his 40 years of practice, stating, “The media set out to disprove and discredit it without any regard for science.”
Amidst this chaotic landscape, a troubling pattern emerges: many members of the government’s COVID treatment panel and advisory groups had affiliations with pharmaceutical companies linked to alternative treatments like remdesivir, raising concerns about conflict of interest and the integrity of their recommendations.
Attkisson's findings suggest that as the government promoted more expensive drugs, the unyielding advocacy for hydroxychloroquine—a low-cost generic—was dismissed, reflecting a troubling trend where financial ties overshadow scientific inquiry.
Despite the mainstream media’s efforts to paint hydroxychloroquine as dangerous, the truth reveals a more insidious narrative at play: one where economic interests dictate the health decisions of millions, often to the detriment of patients seeking real solutions during a public health crisis.
This controversy is not just about a single drug; it epitomizes the broader struggle between political motives and genuine scientific discourse.
As we navigate the aftermath of the pandemic, the call for transparency and scientific integrity becomes more urgent than ever.
In the words of Dr. O'Neill, the ultimate loss in this battle may well be the insights we could have gained had the politics not so thoroughly infected the scientific process surrounding COVID-19 treatments.
As common citizens, it is crucial to remain vigilant about these patterns and advocate for approaches prioritizing patient welfare above financial gain.
Sources:
justthenews.com
bearingarms.com
wattsupwiththat.com
Latest News