Pro-Life Infighting Threatens Trump's Fight Against Abortion
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 88 days ago
**Manipulative Tactics: How Pro-Life Activists Are Detracting From the Fight Against Abortion**
In a troubling development within the pro-life movement, prominent activists are reportedly undermining the candidacy of former President Donald Trump by withholding their support over divergent views on abortion.
Civil rights attorney Harmeet Dhillon has publicly condemned these actions, asserting that they distract from the urgency of protecting unborn lives.
Amid the ongoing battle to restore a culture of life in America, some pro-life factions appear to be prioritizing their own ideological purity over practical strategies that could fuel legislative victories.
During a recent discussion, Dhillon pointed out the hypocrisy of activists who, instead of rallying behind Trump’s bid against the staunchly pro-abortion policies of Kamala Harris, choose to focus their energies on critiquing the Republican platform and Trump's rhetoric.
The irony is palpable: while Trump may not espouse the strict anti-abortion stance some demand, his previous presidency saw significant advancements for the pro-life cause, including the historic overturning of Roe v. Wade.
In stark contrast, the Democrats are willing to offer more extreme measures, including full access to abortion without restrictions—an agenda that is antithetical to the values pro-lifers espouse.
As Dhillon rightly points out, infighting within the pro-life community stands to benefit only one entity: the proponents of abortion rights.
The statistics underscore the urgency of the pro-life message: after the overturn of Roe v. Wade, infanticide numbers have surged, largely fueled by accessible telehealth abortion services.
The Biden administration, continuing to enable this trend, has made it easier than ever for women to obtain chemical abortion pills without the necessary medical oversight.
Pro-life statistics from groups like the U.S. Society of Family Planning reveal disturbing trends: a 13.8 percent rise in abortions in early 2024, with telehealth abortions accounting for 20 percent of those procedures.
To halt this alarming trajectory, pro-life advocates need to coalesce around practical solutions, focusing on state-level initiatives rather than succumbing to internal dissent.
The stakes are higher than ever, especially as ballot initiatives regarding abortion rights loom on the horizon in multiple states.
Instead of advocating for a boycott of Trump, which could inadvertently aid Harris's campaign, pro-life leaders should work to mobilize voters around critical state elections.
Dhillon emphasizes that focusing on eliminating abortion begins at the grassroots level. By unifying efforts instead of fragmenting them, pro-life activists can ensure that the potential for saving lives is maximized.
The upcoming election won't just determine the future of American politics; it will significantly impact the fate of the unborn.
Conservatives must rally behind candidates who offer the best chance to safeguard life—not indulge in divisive squabbles that diminish the shared goal of protecting the most vulnerable among us.
By consolidating efforts and standing firm against the rising tide of pro-abortion policies, pro-life advocates can continue to champion a culture that values every human life.
Sources:
redstate.com
discernreport.com
rvmnews.com
In a troubling development within the pro-life movement, prominent activists are reportedly undermining the candidacy of former President Donald Trump by withholding their support over divergent views on abortion.
Civil rights attorney Harmeet Dhillon has publicly condemned these actions, asserting that they distract from the urgency of protecting unborn lives.
Amid the ongoing battle to restore a culture of life in America, some pro-life factions appear to be prioritizing their own ideological purity over practical strategies that could fuel legislative victories.
During a recent discussion, Dhillon pointed out the hypocrisy of activists who, instead of rallying behind Trump’s bid against the staunchly pro-abortion policies of Kamala Harris, choose to focus their energies on critiquing the Republican platform and Trump's rhetoric.
The irony is palpable: while Trump may not espouse the strict anti-abortion stance some demand, his previous presidency saw significant advancements for the pro-life cause, including the historic overturning of Roe v. Wade.
In stark contrast, the Democrats are willing to offer more extreme measures, including full access to abortion without restrictions—an agenda that is antithetical to the values pro-lifers espouse.
As Dhillon rightly points out, infighting within the pro-life community stands to benefit only one entity: the proponents of abortion rights.
The statistics underscore the urgency of the pro-life message: after the overturn of Roe v. Wade, infanticide numbers have surged, largely fueled by accessible telehealth abortion services.
The Biden administration, continuing to enable this trend, has made it easier than ever for women to obtain chemical abortion pills without the necessary medical oversight.
Pro-life statistics from groups like the U.S. Society of Family Planning reveal disturbing trends: a 13.8 percent rise in abortions in early 2024, with telehealth abortions accounting for 20 percent of those procedures.
To halt this alarming trajectory, pro-life advocates need to coalesce around practical solutions, focusing on state-level initiatives rather than succumbing to internal dissent.
The stakes are higher than ever, especially as ballot initiatives regarding abortion rights loom on the horizon in multiple states.
Instead of advocating for a boycott of Trump, which could inadvertently aid Harris's campaign, pro-life leaders should work to mobilize voters around critical state elections.
Dhillon emphasizes that focusing on eliminating abortion begins at the grassroots level. By unifying efforts instead of fragmenting them, pro-life activists can ensure that the potential for saving lives is maximized.
The upcoming election won't just determine the future of American politics; it will significantly impact the fate of the unborn.
Conservatives must rally behind candidates who offer the best chance to safeguard life—not indulge in divisive squabbles that diminish the shared goal of protecting the most vulnerable among us.
By consolidating efforts and standing firm against the rising tide of pro-abortion policies, pro-life advocates can continue to champion a culture that values every human life.
Sources:
redstate.com
discernreport.com
rvmnews.com
Latest News