Vaccine Injury Reports Surge: Questions About Safety Arise
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 92 days ago
The troubling reality of vaccine injuries is making headlines, and the evidence cannot be ignored.
Nearly 14,000 Britons have sought financial assistance from the government due to severe adverse reactions linked to COVID-19 vaccines, according to recent reports.
This alarming figure highlights the burgeoning concern surrounding vaccine safety as many continue to grapple with the implications of mass vaccination during the pandemic.
The UK’s Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) has witnessed a staggering influx of applications, with almost 14,000 related specifically to COVID-19 vaccines.
Historically, the VDPS was designed to provide a one-time payment to individuals severely disabled due to vaccination, but recent figures suggest that the system is struggling to keep pace with demand.
Out of 16,000 total applications processed since its inception in 1979, only a marginal 175 payments have been approved.
Critically, this equates to less than two percent approval, a statistic that raises significant questions about the level of scrutiny applied to vaccine-related claims.
Most of the claims center around severe conditions like strokes, myocardial infarctions, and life-altering blood clots directly attributed to the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Rejections are reportedly commonplace, with thousands of claims dismissed due to either insufficient proof of harm or failure to meet the necessary disability threshold defined by the government.
This raises pertinent questions about the transparency of the approval process and the underlying standards required for compensation, which some critics deem excessively stringent.
Public health authorities, including those in Downing Street, contend that the VDPS is not essentially a compensation scheme but rather a support mechanism.
With the rise of serious adverse events reported through the UK's Yellow Card system, many are becoming increasingly skeptical of the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccination rollout.
The ongoing debate regarding vaccine safety is compounded by the troubling acknowledgment that numerous countries had previously halted the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine due to similar concerns about adverse effects.
As this story unfolds, it underscores the importance of rigorous independent research and the need for accountability in public health decisions made during a time of crisis.
Conservatives are calling for greater scrutiny, advocating for those injured by the vaccine to receive the recognition and support they deserve.
In a climate where health choices are deeply personal, the call for transparent conversations about vaccine risks continues to resonate across the political spectrum.
As the evidence mounts, it’s clear that vaccine-related injuries necessitate serious discussion and investigation—something that the establishment has often shied away from.
Sources:
naturalnews.com
redstate.com
slaynews.com
Nearly 14,000 Britons have sought financial assistance from the government due to severe adverse reactions linked to COVID-19 vaccines, according to recent reports.
This alarming figure highlights the burgeoning concern surrounding vaccine safety as many continue to grapple with the implications of mass vaccination during the pandemic.
The UK’s Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) has witnessed a staggering influx of applications, with almost 14,000 related specifically to COVID-19 vaccines.
Historically, the VDPS was designed to provide a one-time payment to individuals severely disabled due to vaccination, but recent figures suggest that the system is struggling to keep pace with demand.
Out of 16,000 total applications processed since its inception in 1979, only a marginal 175 payments have been approved.
Critically, this equates to less than two percent approval, a statistic that raises significant questions about the level of scrutiny applied to vaccine-related claims.
Most of the claims center around severe conditions like strokes, myocardial infarctions, and life-altering blood clots directly attributed to the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Rejections are reportedly commonplace, with thousands of claims dismissed due to either insufficient proof of harm or failure to meet the necessary disability threshold defined by the government.
This raises pertinent questions about the transparency of the approval process and the underlying standards required for compensation, which some critics deem excessively stringent.
Public health authorities, including those in Downing Street, contend that the VDPS is not essentially a compensation scheme but rather a support mechanism.
With the rise of serious adverse events reported through the UK's Yellow Card system, many are becoming increasingly skeptical of the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccination rollout.
The ongoing debate regarding vaccine safety is compounded by the troubling acknowledgment that numerous countries had previously halted the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine due to similar concerns about adverse effects.
As this story unfolds, it underscores the importance of rigorous independent research and the need for accountability in public health decisions made during a time of crisis.
Conservatives are calling for greater scrutiny, advocating for those injured by the vaccine to receive the recognition and support they deserve.
In a climate where health choices are deeply personal, the call for transparent conversations about vaccine risks continues to resonate across the political spectrum.
As the evidence mounts, it’s clear that vaccine-related injuries necessitate serious discussion and investigation—something that the establishment has often shied away from.
Sources:
naturalnews.com
redstate.com
slaynews.com
Latest News