Whistleblower Exposes Threats to Trump's Security Protocols
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 19 days ago
**Explosive Whistleblower Claims Raise Alarms Over Secret Service's Treatment of Trump Event Security**
A whistleblower has come forward with alarming allegations regarding the Secret Service's handling of security for former President Donald Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
According to the whistleblower, agents working the July 13th event were explicitly instructed not to request additional manpower resources, despite the immense responsibilities associated with providing security for a former president.
This revelation contradicts the testimony provided by Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe Jr. during a Senate hearing, where he insisted that no security assets were denied for the Butler rally.
Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri has taken immediate action, demanding an explanation from Rowe.
In his correspondence, Hawley emphasized that the whistleblower's claims shed light on a troubling pattern within the Secret Service that could undermine the safety of Trump and, by extension, other former presidents.
Typically, the advance agent for presidential events submits a manpower request detailing the necessary security personnel and resources, which is then reviewed and approved by the Secret Service’s Office of Protective Operations. However, this new information suggests that agents were deliberately discouraged from including crucial security resources such as counter-sniper teams and personnel from the Counter Surveillance Division.
The situation escalates further when considering that counter-snipers were only approved one day before the event, leaving little time for thorough site evaluations, which could jeopardize safety measures during the rally.
Hawley’s letter demands answers to critical questions surrounding the decision-making process that led to these alleged restrictions on manpower requests.
As skepticism grows regarding the actions and authority of top officials within the Secret Service, there is a pressing call for accountability.
The American public deserves transparency regarding the protection of their leaders, particularly someone as polarizing as Donald Trump.
This situation raises significant concerns about potential political bias influencing security decisions and underscores the pressing need for reforms to ensure that all officials receive the necessary protection without political interference.
With the whistleblower shining a light on this concerning matter, the discourse surrounding the treatment of Trump by federal agencies is likely to continue to heat up.
As Trump prepares for future events, the attention will undoubtedly remain focused on how such pivotal security decisions are made and who is ultimately responsible.
Sources:
infowars.com
wnd.com
rumble.com
A whistleblower has come forward with alarming allegations regarding the Secret Service's handling of security for former President Donald Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
According to the whistleblower, agents working the July 13th event were explicitly instructed not to request additional manpower resources, despite the immense responsibilities associated with providing security for a former president.
This revelation contradicts the testimony provided by Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe Jr. during a Senate hearing, where he insisted that no security assets were denied for the Butler rally.
Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri has taken immediate action, demanding an explanation from Rowe.
In his correspondence, Hawley emphasized that the whistleblower's claims shed light on a troubling pattern within the Secret Service that could undermine the safety of Trump and, by extension, other former presidents.
Typically, the advance agent for presidential events submits a manpower request detailing the necessary security personnel and resources, which is then reviewed and approved by the Secret Service’s Office of Protective Operations. However, this new information suggests that agents were deliberately discouraged from including crucial security resources such as counter-sniper teams and personnel from the Counter Surveillance Division.
The situation escalates further when considering that counter-snipers were only approved one day before the event, leaving little time for thorough site evaluations, which could jeopardize safety measures during the rally.
Hawley’s letter demands answers to critical questions surrounding the decision-making process that led to these alleged restrictions on manpower requests.
As skepticism grows regarding the actions and authority of top officials within the Secret Service, there is a pressing call for accountability.
The American public deserves transparency regarding the protection of their leaders, particularly someone as polarizing as Donald Trump.
This situation raises significant concerns about potential political bias influencing security decisions and underscores the pressing need for reforms to ensure that all officials receive the necessary protection without political interference.
With the whistleblower shining a light on this concerning matter, the discourse surrounding the treatment of Trump by federal agencies is likely to continue to heat up.
As Trump prepares for future events, the attention will undoubtedly remain focused on how such pivotal security decisions are made and who is ultimately responsible.
Sources:
infowars.com
wnd.com
rumble.com
Latest News