Kamala Harris' Border Claims Clash With Her Record
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 38 days ago
Kamala Harris, the current Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate, is facing increasing scrutiny over her past record and questionable political advertisements.
Recent statements from Tulare County Sheriff Mike Boudreaux highlight the discrepancies between Harris’s campaign rhetoric and her actual actions while she served as California’s Attorney General.
In a pointed response to a new border security ad featuring Harris, Boudreaux described her portrayal as “pathetic,” emphasizing the failed policies that have left California vulnerable to crime and drug trafficking.
"As Attorney General, Kamala Harris undercut efforts by California law enforcement officials to stop criminals from flooding our state with guns and drugs across the border," he stated.
He elaborated that Harris’s track record contradicts her current narrative, asserting that she defunded essential task forces aimed at tackling these critical issues.
Boudreaux's critique shines a light on an apparent disconnect between Harris’s claims and the realities faced by those on the front lines of law enforcement.
In her ad, Harris claims to have decades of experience fighting violent crime as a "border state prosecutor." However, Boudreaux challenges this notion, stating, “The truth is, Harris never cared about the cartels and did nothing to stop people from illegally crossing the border.”
While Harris attempts to present herself as tough on the border in her advertisements, her past actions show a different story. Critics argue that this type of gaslighting is becoming a staple of her campaign.
Moreover, the Harris campaign seems to be aware of the optics surrounding her celebrity endorsements. Reports indicate that the campaign is intentionally scaling back its reliance on Hollywood stars during the upcoming Democratic National Convention, recognizing the negative perception often associated with elitism.
The attempts to rebrand her campaign come in the wake of widespread disapproval from moderate and independent voters who are disillusioned with the failings of the current administration.
As we move closer to the election, it becomes increasingly clear that the narrative Harris tries to weave around her candidacy will be tested not just by her words, but also by the realities of her past actions.
Conservative leaders and law enforcement officials alike are poised to remind voters of the stark contrast between Harris's lofty campaign promises and her record in office.
Sources:
redstate.com
rumble.com
breitbart.com
Recent statements from Tulare County Sheriff Mike Boudreaux highlight the discrepancies between Harris’s campaign rhetoric and her actual actions while she served as California’s Attorney General.
In a pointed response to a new border security ad featuring Harris, Boudreaux described her portrayal as “pathetic,” emphasizing the failed policies that have left California vulnerable to crime and drug trafficking.
"As Attorney General, Kamala Harris undercut efforts by California law enforcement officials to stop criminals from flooding our state with guns and drugs across the border," he stated.
He elaborated that Harris’s track record contradicts her current narrative, asserting that she defunded essential task forces aimed at tackling these critical issues.
Boudreaux's critique shines a light on an apparent disconnect between Harris’s claims and the realities faced by those on the front lines of law enforcement.
In her ad, Harris claims to have decades of experience fighting violent crime as a "border state prosecutor." However, Boudreaux challenges this notion, stating, “The truth is, Harris never cared about the cartels and did nothing to stop people from illegally crossing the border.”
While Harris attempts to present herself as tough on the border in her advertisements, her past actions show a different story. Critics argue that this type of gaslighting is becoming a staple of her campaign.
Moreover, the Harris campaign seems to be aware of the optics surrounding her celebrity endorsements. Reports indicate that the campaign is intentionally scaling back its reliance on Hollywood stars during the upcoming Democratic National Convention, recognizing the negative perception often associated with elitism.
The attempts to rebrand her campaign come in the wake of widespread disapproval from moderate and independent voters who are disillusioned with the failings of the current administration.
As we move closer to the election, it becomes increasingly clear that the narrative Harris tries to weave around her candidacy will be tested not just by her words, but also by the realities of her past actions.
Conservative leaders and law enforcement officials alike are poised to remind voters of the stark contrast between Harris's lofty campaign promises and her record in office.
Sources:
redstate.com
rumble.com
breitbart.com
Latest News