Praying Grandma Faces Extreme Penalties for January 6
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 104 days ago
**Outrageous Penalties: ‘J6 Praying Grandma’ Faces Unprecedented Fine and Restrictions**
In a shocking display of government overreach, 72-year-old Rebecca Lavrenz, dubbed the “Jan 6 Praying Grandma,” has been handed a staggering fine of $103,000, believed to be one of the largest ever imposed for a misdemeanor in U.S. history.
Lavrenz’s supposed crime? Participating in a Capitol protest on January 6, 2021, where she entered an open door and prayed in a tourist area.
The official narrative, heavily promoted by the Biden administration, paints her as a threat. U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves described her as “unrepentant,” alleging that her vocal criticism of the political persecution of January 6 protesters is indicative of her supposed ongoing risk for “political violence.”
The harsh penalties don't end with the fine. Lavrenz has been sentenced to 12 months of probation, including six months of house arrest. In a move that raises serious questions about free speech, the judge has also prohibited her from using the internet for six months, a restriction typically seen in more severe criminal cases. This effectively crushes her ability to operate her Bed & Breakfast and limits her avenues for fundraising to appeal her sentence.
During the hearing, the presiding judge, Zia Faruqui, made a series of disturbing comments questioning Lavrenz's priorities and faith. Faruqui suggested that her ministry to individuals outside her family was misguided, implying that her commitment to her beliefs was unjustifiable.
Lavrenz’s defense attorney, John M. Pierce, has expressed deep concerns over the ruling, noting that the penalty reflects a “two-tier system of justice” that is slowly eroding the foundation of American democracy.
Pierce characterized Lavrenz as "the finest our nation has to offer," highlighting the absurdity of her treatment compared to the leniency often shown towards far-left protestors and rioters.
As Lavrenz prepares to appeal this unprecedented ruling, her story has ignited outrage among many who see it as a blatant example of selective enforcement of the law and a crackdown on dissenting voices.
This case serves as a reminder of the increasing penalties faced by those who dare to speak out against the establishment and raise questions about the government’s actions. In an election year, the stakes have never been higher for individuals fighting for their beliefs.
Sources:
dailycaller.com
dailycallernewsfoundation.org
thenationalpulse.com
In a shocking display of government overreach, 72-year-old Rebecca Lavrenz, dubbed the “Jan 6 Praying Grandma,” has been handed a staggering fine of $103,000, believed to be one of the largest ever imposed for a misdemeanor in U.S. history.
Lavrenz’s supposed crime? Participating in a Capitol protest on January 6, 2021, where she entered an open door and prayed in a tourist area.
The official narrative, heavily promoted by the Biden administration, paints her as a threat. U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves described her as “unrepentant,” alleging that her vocal criticism of the political persecution of January 6 protesters is indicative of her supposed ongoing risk for “political violence.”
The harsh penalties don't end with the fine. Lavrenz has been sentenced to 12 months of probation, including six months of house arrest. In a move that raises serious questions about free speech, the judge has also prohibited her from using the internet for six months, a restriction typically seen in more severe criminal cases. This effectively crushes her ability to operate her Bed & Breakfast and limits her avenues for fundraising to appeal her sentence.
During the hearing, the presiding judge, Zia Faruqui, made a series of disturbing comments questioning Lavrenz's priorities and faith. Faruqui suggested that her ministry to individuals outside her family was misguided, implying that her commitment to her beliefs was unjustifiable.
Lavrenz’s defense attorney, John M. Pierce, has expressed deep concerns over the ruling, noting that the penalty reflects a “two-tier system of justice” that is slowly eroding the foundation of American democracy.
Pierce characterized Lavrenz as "the finest our nation has to offer," highlighting the absurdity of her treatment compared to the leniency often shown towards far-left protestors and rioters.
As Lavrenz prepares to appeal this unprecedented ruling, her story has ignited outrage among many who see it as a blatant example of selective enforcement of the law and a crackdown on dissenting voices.
This case serves as a reminder of the increasing penalties faced by those who dare to speak out against the establishment and raise questions about the government’s actions. In an election year, the stakes have never been higher for individuals fighting for their beliefs.
Sources:
dailycaller.com
dailycallernewsfoundation.org
thenationalpulse.com
Latest News